eh.... I once was a christian and am now an atheist, but it is definitely a tradeoff. I think there is more contentment to being a true Christian, because you have the promise of eternity. When I became an atheist, it was very stressful, because you have to deal with the fact that you are going to die and that is that. It's not a fact to make a human happy, which is why I think we have so many religions in the first place. However, you are "freed" up to enjoy things that are forbidden by the Bible, so there is less stress in that department. I think to be an atheist you have to enjoy what time you have and still find a purpose in life, mainly, helping humanity along when you can.
I think a lot of Christians go through a lot of stress themselves, because they are attacked by society a lot these days, because a lot of them have doubts themselves about their religion, and because they have to suppress some of their instinctual urges in order to obey the bible.
(Of course, I was a Christian when I believed in the Bible, and once I didn't, I was an atheist. It's not like I "choose" one or the other just because of the benefits or stress.)
2006-10-29 13:58:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by s_e_e 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Before I was an atheist I was an agnostic, and there hasn't really been any practical change to my life based on my beliefs. So I can't really say it enhanced or freed up my life. If anything I've just become more frustrated with the pervasiveness of religion, but that probably would have happened anyway.
2006-10-29 13:56:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If anything being an atheist can be difficult at times, if you ask me it's much easier to get caught up in a nice religion where everything's already mapped out for you. When your an Atheist you accept the mysteries of life and death and make the most with what ya got.
2006-10-29 13:54:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Aniatario 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
After I freed myself from the religion I grew up in, I was no longer troubled by the disconnect between what I was being taught and scientific evidence, or by its contradictions with a separate set of moral values that I was beginning to develop. Eventually, I began the process of challenging the idea of religion in general. I no longer felt like I had to supress or censor my thoughts.
I learned to hold myself accountable for my own actions. I learned to forgive myself for my mistakes, so I became better at forgiving others. Because I no longer believed in an afterlife, I learned not to fear death and became more determined to use my life to make an impact of the world.
2006-10-29 14:35:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Linda 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
i'm an extremely chuffed agnostic yet i have met such diverse religious those who imagine that someone who isn't a believer can't in all likelihood be a contented fulfilled human being. i have met Christians who were effective and appeared chuffed besides yet i have also met many who're as you defined. i imagine those human beings have a challenge (personality, psychological, chemical??) and performance taken faith too far. they could not experience free in basic terms having their own faith. They obsess about different's sin and how they ought to get fascinated in preventing it. They obsess about their own sin and how they might burn in hell for it. They obsess about preaching the be conscious and replacing others. They challenge about letting in new concepts (like technology) that would want to corrupt them so as that they motel to one of those psychological suicide. Being faith loose skill you're a lot less at chance of this obsession. i love to study and that i do a lot of volunteer artwork which i encounter very rewarding and performance made a lot of acquaintances by. even although i'm not religious, i appreciate discussing faith with open minded human beings. i'm not particular why the version except as I indicated till now i imagine possibly some mixture of environmental/genetic impacts predispose some human beings to extreme, risky religious dispositions. obviously it really is truly speculative and thoroughly unproven. in basic terms something that I have wondered about and known. possibly loose-thinkers, nonbelievers are a lot less predisposed to this kind of component? I have in spite of the indisputable fact that, met some very depressed atheists yet i imagine that maximum of them fall into the atheist because of a few deep sadness in existence class. while i'm in basic terms skeptical in accordance to psychological and religious exploration and performance stumbled on different techniques of pleasant the needs faith in a lot of situations fills.
2016-12-05 08:48:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For one thing,it freed me up from the judgements and dogmas of the church authorities.I have personally experienced a Prime Identity,and I realized that I am thankful I did not accept the christian ideas of God.In that sense,I'm an atheist.
2006-10-29 13:57:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It enhanced and freed up my life by releasing me from the shackles of religion. It contributed to my freedom of choice, thought, and sense of well-being.
2006-10-29 13:52:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
It's amazing to live for today and not live for your death. Not feeling shame for simply living. No heaven or hell. And the best, taking responsibility for your own life without some imaginary mystical creature judging your every move.
2006-10-29 14:08:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Logicnreason 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It allows you to define your life for yourslef, and not by some oppresive moral values dicated in a 2,000 year old book. AN atheist does not need to look to an illusory higher power, he looks within himself for the answers to ethical and moral dilemmas.
2006-10-29 13:52:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Random 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Bertrand Russell was freed up to bang different women for the rest of his life
2006-10-29 13:53:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋