2006-10-29 13:49:22 · 13 answers · asked by Stephanie 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If the works of scientists in the Theory of Evolution develop further and turn the Theory into a LAW of Evolution. What is the difference betwee a theory and a law in science? (I am going to ask the question but I have reach my daily limit for making question)
2006-10-29 13:56:00 · answer #1 · answered by techeroflogic 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creation
2006-10-29 21:52:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
One of the leading quantum physicists in the world, while lecturing on the first 3 seconds of the universe said that the elements had to be so precise (for the big bang to occur), that it would be like taking aim at a one square inch object on the other end of the universe (20 billion light years away) and hitting that object bullseye.
Why is it so hard to believe that we've been created for a purpose, instead of being here by some unfatomably impossible chance? Seek the truth, friend.
2006-10-29 22:13:33 · answer #3 · answered by disciple 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creationism with Evolution a factor.
2006-10-29 22:02:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Fact from fiction, truth from diction. A lot of people would want to say that creation is a dogma based off unproven tenets and beliefs. But lest look at the cold facts. If these people truly stuck to their rhetoric, they would have no qualms with someone marrying their sister or a guy wedding his widowed mother and fathering his own siblings. Why do things like that make people skin crawl? Sin. And how can you have sin unless you sin against something? People try to say it is a sin against nature, like what the hell does that mean? Nature is nature. To say that you might graft in some people or acts you don't want. Abortion to be one of them. Animals in nature do not have abortions because carrying a pup, cub, etc, will slow them on the hunt, or take up more room in the den. And certainly not because it will take up too much time to raise the youngsters or ruin bikini season. So, many of those who want to poo poo creation want to have the cake and eat it too. But in truth, it never works that way. So off the evidence. I think it is quite clear.
2006-10-29 22:02:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is a false dichotomy. Attempting to compare the two concepts as viable alternatives is deplorable. One is a scientific theory founded on evidence and research while the other is a dogmatic belief without any credible evidence.
2006-10-29 21:53:03 · answer #6 · answered by Michael 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution ^ infinity + 1 = I win
2006-10-29 21:53:31 · answer #7 · answered by eri 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Go to college! Evolution of course.
2006-10-29 21:57:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
psuedoscience versus science
untestable versus testable.
I'll take evidence over no evidence any day.
2006-10-29 21:59:52 · answer #9 · answered by Sparkiplasma 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You say that as though there's actually a contest.
2006-10-29 21:52:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋