The less time you wait, the better. If your children are close in age they will be closer at home. It's good for them because they need someone to play with and someone to relate to. It willbe easier on you in some ways too, because you will go through "stages" at the same time. Like: the "first day of school" stage, and the "dating stage". It also won't be as hard for the oldest and youngest.
2006-10-29 05:42:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ashley J 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no right or wrong answer it's really up to you but if you wait more than 8 years your body is like you've never had a baby so it's a bit harder than having the second one the only amount of time you have to wait is the 6 weeks after a baby is born or 6 months after a miscarriage
2006-10-29 05:45:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by jo_jo_baby2004 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
It all depends on the age difference you want between your kids. I have 3 kids and the span between the oldest to the middle one is 2 and a half years, and then 23 months from the middle to he baby. I have enough space between them that they were each a bit bigger and were not jealous of the new baby and they are all still close enough in age that they can play together and not feel like they don't have anyone to play with. Good luck in what you decide.
2006-10-29 05:38:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by af_wx_wife 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
My personal opinion would be to wait at least until the first baby is out of pampers before having the second one. And I'm pretty sure then you will know exactly how long should wait before having the third.
2006-10-29 05:44:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My son is 5 and i still haven't tried yet but most people will have kids like 2-3 years apart if you want them close in age.
I have 6 siblings and their ages are 33, 30, (I'm 27), 25, 21, 17 and 11
It is up to you. I would wait until one is out of diapers before having another one but that is me.
Good luck
2006-10-29 05:42:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You should wait at least 18 months between each child. Gives you and your body time to get healthy after your previous pregnancy.
2006-10-29 07:31:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
2 years? that doesn't make any sense. the traditional suggestion is two complete cycles (era) giving the hormones time to stabilize (so max of three months). We waited 3 months after miscarriage, have been given pregnant lower back precise away and the 2d being pregnant became efficient. in terms of precautions, you could progesterone and toddler aspirin for the 1st trimester of the being pregnant (to shrink miscarriage risk with the aid of low progesterone and clotting around placenta). Sorry on your loss and stable success.
2016-10-03 02:07:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on you and your health plus the finances of having 3. Plus if you plan to go to work again or not. Children really do take a lot of planing and care so You aught to take You into consideration too.
2006-10-29 05:37:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by tracey s 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wait an till you have one in school and then try for another, but you should wait 1 to 1 and a half years to have kids after having one that is.
2006-10-29 05:47:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by God R 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
it is always better to wait and give a good gap in between i feel it is better to give a gap of atleast 3 years. it is important and good for your health and for your baby as well.
2006-10-29 05:38:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by ravishr 2
·
0⤊
1⤋