Why is it that short people are not taken seriously as leaders?

Question

I'm not sure, but most people wouldnt am i correct? Does height evan matter to most people? What do you think?

Answer 1

Case in point, look at Michael Dukakis

Answer 2

You should read some of the books by Desmond Morris. He writes about how evolutionary biology shapes our perceptions of others and our social institutions and customs. I believe this question is something he covers in his books.

Basically, I think most people evaluate a potential leader by their animal, gut reactions. (As evidence, consider polling data where respondents say things like, "I can't vote for him, he just seems like a wimp" or "Well, I prefer him because he's much more attractive.) Many voters don't stop and think, "What is this person's intelligence and experience? Does he or she have a consistent plan? Are they able to work with others but make the unpopular choice when it is right?"

Instead, they just get a "feel" for them and base their evaluation accordingly. Well, the "gut instincts" we have are largely the result of evolution. In many animal species, it is the largest and most intimidating male who leads the pack, pretty much for the reason that he can physically subdue the others and is the best defense from outside threats.

For humans, a taller person is more physically impressive. Their appearance inspires awe, regardless of how much knowledge they possess. This gives them an advantage when vying for leadership, particularly when those choosing the leader use their instincts rather than their brains.

Answer 3

Generally speaking, I think you are correct. Our society views a strong capable leader as a big person. Maybe it has to do with feeling safe and secure. Short people have a harder time gaining respect, as do women. I don't think that it is an all-or-nothing venture though. Short people can be taken seriously, it may take more time. However, as I have experienced, consistency and perseverence win out.

Answer 4

It is our superficial, low attention span, general public. Just remember that Napoleon was taken very seriously, he was of short stature. He was a Conqueror and a military Genius, if it had not for the Russian Winter, he had to retreat after taking Moscow,
he probably would have ruled the world.

Answer 5

Hitler was short.

Mind you, as a general rule, taller people earn more - earnings are directly proportional to height. As with any rule there are lots of exceptions.

Answer 6

Ever hear of Napoleon Bonaparte?

Answer 7

Napoleon was short.