from what i have read they ate it, what do you think? are there any verses that dispute this i only know the verses that say they did
2006-10-28 21:32:09 · 4 answers · asked by unitedfaith 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes, I think they were eaten. I don't recall any verses saying otherwise.
2006-10-28 21:38:42 · answer #1 · answered by lindakflowers 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Y'know, that's a great question. I always thought that if they ATE IT, what was the "sacrifice" they were making? Doesnt it seem that to "sacrifice" something would be to give it up? To go without? OK, that being said, there's also the term "burnt offering" which would make more sense to me as a "sacrifice" if they burned it all up and didnt get to eat any.
2006-10-28 22:45:09 · answer #2 · answered by Alias400 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure they did, food was scarce back then, and other religions that use animal sacrifice see no reason not to eat the animal just for that reason
2006-10-28 21:37:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am really not in favor of animal sacrifice.
2006-10-28 21:34:38 · answer #4 · answered by Bright 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋