you look really good in red. No, I mean, REALLY good.................
2006-10-28 16:32:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't get the connection.
The contents of the Bible have been in dispute since the time of Jesus. For instance, the Roman Catholic Bible still has a few books that the Protestant one doesn't have. In addition, there has been debates of various works that never made it to either edition. So your statement, "100 years after they chopped and edited the Bible" makes no sense, and is in no way historical fact.
2006-10-28 23:16:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by geek49203 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes you may be right on that but "Lucifer" was made popular in the christian medieval or dark ages and therefore, far after the printing press invention and far ahead of you! So what are you trying to say and/or prove?
2006-10-28 23:44:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nikolas S 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think it's rather inconvenient to christians. If the printing press were around when Jesus was supposed to have existed, then there would have been plenty of contemporary documentation to prove his existence.
We would have run out of trees though; which would have been bad.
2006-10-28 23:16:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Interesting isn't it. Most people didn't learn to read or write either.
However christianity has only been supposedly immortalised since the creation of printing.
2006-10-28 23:17:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'd be getting your facts right before you type. You sure you know what was chopped and edited considering you wearing the devils horns, that is no joke. The devil is no fun and games he actually hates you. He is a liar and full of hatred. I hope your eyes open up to the truth of God's light and that you really see the deception your under. it's a shame your not promoting someone that adores you so much like....................................... Jesus Christ.
2006-10-28 23:17:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by jesus' princess 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
Actually, you don't look good in red, and neither does the lady in the picture. Furthermore, the assertions in the bible have always been in dispute so what the heck are you talking about? And, convenient for whom? It is unclear what you implication is.
2006-10-28 23:53:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Karasu 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
Convenient is one way to look at it.
2006-10-28 23:15:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by AuroraDawn 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
very--wonder what kinds of things those monastic scribes were leaving out when they got writers cramp
2006-10-28 23:18:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
they (the people who wrote) were called scribes they (the texts) were called scrolls now you know!
2006-10-28 23:20:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by candi_k7 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
true but everthing was written on stone ,scroll are something
2006-10-28 23:15:24
·
answer #11
·
answered by Me 5
·
1⤊
1⤋