English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

32 answers

Yes.

If they leave school and then sign on they should be conscripted for 5 years on minimum wage with no benefits to learn a trade and give something to the community.

2006-10-28 09:26:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Made? No. Encouraged a bit more? Definately. I was in the navy for 5 years. I didnt want to go in to begin with but was actively encouraged to by my Mum. To begin with it was not the best, but as the years went on it became the best experience of my life so far. I've worked with conscripts and i would say there was a mixed feeling about it among them. Now if schools gave pupils a two week work experience with a force of their choice a lot more young people would join up. The only reason I left was to lead a more settled lifestyle. For a single young person it cant be beaten. You can take a person out of the navy but you cant take the navy out of that person

2006-10-28 09:58:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The armed forces offer college coursed for 16 to 17 year olds wishing to join the forces which comprises of 42 weeks training in military history, leadership skills, personal developement, IT skills as well as English and Mathematic skills these places are highly sort after. The course is hard going and incorporates the usual basic training that all recruits undergo not everyone is suitable therefore it would be almost impossible to enforce such thing combined with the commitment factors what type of soldier will you get if they are being press ganged into this.

2006-10-28 09:35:03 · answer #3 · answered by lorraine w 2 · 1 0

Well pollyanne it depends what kind of country you want to live in.

Do you really want to be living in a country where people are forced to do things they don't want to do? Do you think it's right to take people and force them through the intense unpleasantness of basic training? Do you like the idea of the government forcing people into this kind of life?

See the problem is, as Bush has shown, governments can be corrupt and inept. Bush sent our forces in to battle for no good reason in a dangerous and wholly unnecessary war in Iraq. Once you start forcing people into the military, it opens the door for further abuse of our armed forces. So in addition to the half trillion dollars that Bush squandered putting us in Iraq, there would be billions more squandered on forcing people through basic training for no good reason.

Our country already has some scary methods of government control. For example bribing people into signing up into the military with the promise of a free college education. Recruiting children in high school into signing up. In other free countries even this seems a little too far. But now you are suggesting that we step it up an notch and force people into a grueling and unpleasant lifestyle, and for what? I just don't see how it would better society. And while we still have despicable politicians around who abuse the armed forces and put them in harms way unnecessarily, I think we need to be very careful about giving them additional powers over the citizens.

2006-10-28 10:08:57 · answer #4 · answered by ZCT 7 · 0 0

i think the respond might ensure in many circumstances. They the two connect from delight or a feeling of accountability to u . s .. the rationalization I say it extremely is using fact the defense force are assembly or exceeding the recruiting demands in almost each and every case. This even however we've an unpopular war and there's a distinctive risk of going to Iraq. i such as you joined the militia (army), and want I had stayed till retirement age. I did this out of a feeling of accountability to u . s ., I felt the call to serve and located the journey academic and life shaping. I certainly have not at all regretted it for a minute.

2016-11-26 01:10:46 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I definetly agree with Murty since joining the military during these times is a decision involving life and death. I think cooperation with your leader or king is extremely important during a time of war. Obviously, as the president you can abuse your position of power by forcing young people into the military to fight a war that they may not even understand or believe in. But you cant do this without consequence. One of the big consequences, which some of the injections they give you in the military can make up for, is lack of morale. A soldier absolutely NEEDS morale and it is important that he strongly believes in what he is fighting for. Lack of motivation on the battlefield can seriously decrease your chances of winning anything at all.

2006-10-28 10:13:23 · answer #6 · answered by Sir 3 · 0 0

i don't know about the us or any other country but in the uk i belive this country has gone down hill very fast the youth of today have no drive or hope for the future they are just happy to bum around do a dead end job just to get enough money to get drunk on a friday and saturday night and start fights, i read somewhere that this generations young men are over violent not because of the tv or video games but because they have no war to fight,
they problems we're having with drunk kids in gangs can be sorted with 2 years in the armed forces they will learn skills and become a asset to the country and it will releave pressure on the armed force at the moment with regards to personnel.

2006-10-29 01:51:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think young people should be Made to join anything. It's a career choice and it's Their choice. People aren't Made become nurses and teacher, why should the armed forces be any different.

2006-10-28 09:42:09 · answer #8 · answered by esther 2 · 1 0

I don't think old or young should be made to join the armed forces. It should be on your own free will. I can't imagine being deployed with someone that didn't want to be join the military. That right there is a dangerous situation.

2006-10-28 09:26:20 · answer #9 · answered by Gilla 3 · 1 1

I wouldn't like to see a return to compulsory National Service for all but, with so many prisons full to bursting point, it might be a good idea to make some offenders undertake National Service instead of Community Service. I think many people need to learn good manners and respect these days.

2006-10-28 10:09:38 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

How can this question even be asked.

No, it should be free will, and with the way the world is currently, you are talking about someones life. Only THE PERSON THEMSELVES has the right to choose if they wish to risk their own life as those the arm forces do.

Whether they lack discipline or direction etc - it is THEIR choice. They can be helped to other paths which are much safer.

2006-10-28 09:28:56 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers