karl you know better than that brother cheers for waking me up the other week , i dont know if you have already but watch these films:
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-6495462761605341661&q=martial+law
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-82095917705734983&q=bohemian+grove
2006-10-28 09:46:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think it should be mandatory that you read before you ask a question. Hani had hostages and most people (at least Westerners)are hesitate about getting them killed by arguing. If you remember he made an example and killed one passenger right way. Intimidate then threaten, typical terrorist training.
God Bless You and The Southern People!
I am sorry I had not read through all the answers and after reading the conspiracy theorists I had to add this:
. However, I doubt that is the case for 9/11 I have seen the tapes there is a plane going into the Pentagon, there were no bombs in the WTC. The one thing that is questionable and we even debate that here is that I believe that Flight 93 was shot down and that they allowed the passengers the credit to keep from the possible fall-out from shooting down our own plane. We have staff filing FOIAS asking for armament records, which at first were denied, and now appear doctored.
The families like it this way and certainly will not say anything. That is like the proof of Davy Crockett not dying fighting in the Alamo but after he was captured, so what does that make him any less a hero? Hell no! Anyway that is the only thing that appears to have been lied about the rest is garbage and you are wasting your time, however it is a free country so knock yourself out
2006-10-28 13:46:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
First of all, its because it never happened the way the "Official Story" states. Its all a big conspiracy. Theres more questions on that story then alot would think. Like, why would people call their phone company and tell them their plane had been jacked? Id call family. Second, at the height they were, cell phones had a 0.0009% chance of actually connecting, and there was 3 or 4 phone calls.
How come at the crash site there is no plane, but just a hole in the ground? It looks like someone threw paper and garbage around. Why is it they find pieces miles away from the actual site? It was spread over a 5 mile radius. Which means only one thing, that it exploded in the air. Which is what people said they saw. A missile going from the ground up to the plane, then an explosion. There are many many holes in the "Official Story."
The answer to your question is simple, it never happend like that.
Oh, and almost all of the so called hijackers have been found alive in various parts of the world. Some were even seen in videos with "Bin Laden", who is a CIA asset trained in the 70's to basically do what hes doing now, cause chaos, take the blame for something we do and not get caught.
2006-10-28 09:33:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mashu 4
·
2⤊
5⤋
I think it's an absolute disgrace that people try to wriggle out of the facts of what happened on that dreadful day. I have no time for the conspiracy theory lovers and no time for people who ask questions such as this. The cowards came from behind with sharp knives with which to slit throats. It therefore didn't matter how tall or small the victims were.
2006-10-28 10:27:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
ok well I BELIEVE YOU. a plane load of gun-loving, arab-hating, patriotic americans are NOT going to let 4 hijackers stand up and take over their plane. www.letsroll911.org flight 175 fires a missile at the south tower 1 second b4 impact. NOTHING ELSE MATTERS. THAT IS NOT POSSIBLE GIVEN THE OFFICIAL STORY. 9/11 was the excuse to invade afgahanistan. and Iraq. and Iran. And Syria. and need i say more. www.whatreallyhappened.com for info on Princess Di, JFK, Waco and a hundred other lies.
2006-10-28 09:55:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
do u really think thats what really happened?it seems like u were there.Terrorists have everythin planned,I dont think it happened the way you explain it.Im a flight attendant,we do get anti-terrorism training but when it comes to being on a plane it doesnt really matter how tall and strong you are,if someone has an attacking plan it is usually a damn good plan hard to tell when or how its gonna happen.Unppredictable things happen when you less expect them.
2006-10-28 09:22:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
because was sitting down strapped into a seat facing away from his attacker !!!!! when will you muppets ever learn ? perhaps there are evil sick people in this world that would do anything over religion and its not some crazy plot from politicians !!!!!!
2006-10-28 11:01:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by darren w 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Did you know how Houdini died?
I'll leave it to you to figure it out
Remember what killed Steve Irwin?
Pretty petty for the Superman he was
It is all about the element of surprise, and not being prepared, pal
2006-10-28 09:17:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
The pilot was a big man - score one point.
The hijacker had both the element of complete surprise and a weapon - score two points.
Two points is more than one point. Game over.
2006-10-28 09:19:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
7⤊
2⤋
no a pilot would do his best to save his crew and passengers, I am sure he did the best he could, right. Anyway if you say someone with a BOMB strapped to them, I think the last thing you would do is rush him!
2006-10-28 09:12:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Star 4
·
5⤊
3⤋