And how they get all dressed up on the weekend, walk into an arbitrary building, listen to a totally arbitrary person reading from the totally absurd, self-inconsistent story, walk out one hour later...adorable.
2006-10-28 07:46:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Fairy tales are fiction. So when an adult takes it as truth and not a fairy tale, then the adult is believing a lie. Fairy tales can have a moral of the story, that a person can perceive, but that would be believing in the moral of the fairy tale, not believing in the fairy tale.
So, it isn't cute.
2006-10-28 07:52:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by t a m i l 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A great deal better than the evils committed by some jerks I much rather see adults believing in fairy tales
2006-10-28 07:51:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sugar 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I've never seen a fairy. I've seen an imp, the King of the Earth
elementals, GOB. My grandmothers spirit. Elementals, a freinds
astral double, a lost soul, an eye, and a spirit guardian of a
psychic girlfirends that looked like a skeleton.
That was with the naked eye.
2006-10-28 07:48:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by zenbuddhamaster 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do not comprehend if this solutions your question or not, yet between the important motives that i position self assurance in Christianity is that the human beings who knew Jesus were prepared to be tortured to lack of existence particularly than replace their tale that they said Jesus go back from the useless. If the apostles were mendacity about seeing the resurrected Christ, then why did not they take decrease back their tale even as they were in my opinion being tortured to lack of existence? each and every between the apostles (except John, who died a organic lack of existence in exile on Patmos), were killed for his or her faith. does not a liar recant this tale to save his own existence? What did the apostles ought to achieve by technique of creating all of it up? What good does repute do for a useless human being? I settle for the apostles' tale because the witnesses were creditable. playstation : sure, I have heard the crack about suicide bombers, in spite of the indisputable fact that the important distinction between the famous bombers & the apostles are: (a million) the bombers did not see Mommand in my opinion, so as that they don't seem eye-witnesses to something (unlike Peter, & Paul, who claimed to confirm Jesus alive with their own eyes and then died particularly than take it decrease back); and, (2) the bombers are killing chance free human beings (others) for his or her faith, not suffering for it (i anticipate that blowing your self up is quick & painless compared with being crucified.).
2016-12-05 07:58:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This question, in one form or another, keeps popping up on the R&S section.
Does anyone really think that people will abandon their religious beliefs and become atheists by having an anonymous computer avatar mock them? I don't think that they care.
2006-10-28 07:48:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Randy G 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, but could you imagine me trying to kill you because I thought Lucky the Leprechaun was the true way and you thought Count Chocula was the true way.
It's always fun and games until someone gets injured, murdered, burn and the stake.
2006-10-28 07:53:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm reminded of the Empiricist v. Rationalist thing that went on back when DeCartes and Locke were in, erm, disagreement.
2006-10-28 07:55:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Muffie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Isn't it funny when adult men use the word cute in a sentence?
2006-10-28 07:47:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by booellis 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Its even cuter when adults are so close minded and self absorbed that they feel the need to bash what others hold dear.
2006-10-28 07:47:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Myaloo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋