Should airlines be required to install lead shields above the pilots?

Question

And how about the stewardess resting spots?

Answer 1

You're assuming that the crew flies more than the passsengers, but some passengers fly more often than that.

Also, one of my PhD friends said that when lead is exposed to certain types solar radiation (forget which), it gives off gamma rays, which is much worse for the human body.

Answer 2

As a prepare driving force, i think that airline pilots must be paid better than us. however the distinctive solutions on right here already are an absolute shaggy dog tale. anybody who thinks using a prepare is easy isn't residing interior the actual international. Admittedly, bodily moving a prepare from A to B isn't demanding yet each and all the stuff that is going with it, particularly inventory and course expertise is the place the money is earned. i'm perpetually getting stick with regard to the money I earn yet my respond is that this: If it quite is rather undemanding and overpaid then why are not you all doing it? (take word, London's nighttime standard). yet another accusation is that prepare drivers are paid too plenty with regards to professions which contain nursing. might desire to it no longer be that nurses are extremely underpaid as adversarial to coach drivers being overpaid?

Answer 3

No. There is no reason to install lead on an airplane. I assume you are thinking of radiation protection, but lead over the cockpit would not be an effect measure in anycase. Plus lead is far to heavy a material to incorporate into a machince that is engineered to be a light as possible to maximize efficiency in flight.

Answer 4

why? Whatever for? For protection from radiation from space? Well, then it should be all around or else the radiation will seep in from other parts of the plane!

Actually, the exposure level is already taken into account in the materials used in the plane construction. They are able to help minimise the radiation level as the plane flies up above.