Only if we can send George and Dick out to the front lines, with ALL the leaders of congress, maybe the whole bunch right behind them.
2006-10-28 04:38:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by madjer21755 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
NO. Afghanistan Yes.We are over in Iraq for two reasons: Business and Oil. When I flew shot gun on a Huey in Vietnam it wasn't to protect a BUSINESS CONVOY! Doesn't that come AFTER peace is restored?
The white House mixes truth with fiction. When was the last time an terrorist was killed in IRAQ? THEY ARE INSURGENTS! Read the definition.... rising up against established authority.
The weak minded bought the spin from swift boat to now.
Back in Vietnam era there was no Gulf of Tonkin incident, no communist domino theory and that was under a Demoractic!
Fight terrorism like they do. Share info among Federal branches (CIA FBI etc) Be subversive.Undercover, assasins... yes America it's a fact
We have are self to blame ...less than 40% of registered voters vote! So Please vote
We need new ideas and new parties
Socail security reform. No way here's why: 12.4% is deducted from your pay. 6.2%your employer pays and 6.2% you pay. That a 12.4% saving for business.........HUGE cost cutting measure.
Pay taxes... taxes are good.. look around. We have what we have because of taxes but they are not used correctly.
Make immigrants come into this country legally. Pay them MIn wage and have them PAY taxes. SEED the future with tax payer. Is this president a visionary? Is he seeding the future with tax payers? No he wants business to hire them for cash, stay a while, take our money back to THEIR home and send us new recurits and we do it all over again. Noboby can see this????????
Look what else is lost with no S.S. Survivor benefits, disability payments
American worker are guaranteed payment at the end of their career....OR give it to some MBA wiz every pay and he will do right by you
Any more questios??
2006-10-28 05:34:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by rmudflap546 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US will eventually leave Iraq and stop the war there with new leaders being appointed to the Iraqi government. But till then bloodshed will continue.
2006-10-28 04:41:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Andreas K 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
No! We never should have gone. It is a bloody mess now and Bush and his cronies still say we'll win. WIN? There is no winning in war-with death after death-how can that be winning?
2006-10-28 04:43:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cindy P 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
no, at least Iraq was stable when Saddam was in power, now I raq will become like Afghanistan, a terrorist haven.
2006-10-28 04:41:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by King Midas 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Like it or not, we ARE involved!
2006-10-28 04:39:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
The US is ALREADY involved.
2006-10-28 04:37:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by "I Want to Know Your Answer 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
No and we owe them big time!
2006-10-28 04:40:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kelly L 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
no, not really. my sister is there and i really think she shouldnt be there.
2006-10-28 07:09:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by [[you're only selling sex now]] 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, leave those people to rot in hell.
2006-10-28 04:37:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋