which would it be, and why?
1. Inconsistancies in the bible?
2. Immoral principles of christianity (hell, original sin)
3. Goes against reason and logic
4. Or ... none of the above?
2006-10-27 19:09:05 · 25 answers · asked by Black Parade Billie 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
3
2006-10-27 19:11:03 · answer #1 · answered by AuroraDawn 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Christianity relies on the bible and it extremely is been shown, to my delight, that the bible isn't something different than a plagiarized version of the Sumerian pills it extremely is a history of the Annunaki. The god of the bible isn't something better than the leaders of the Annunaki who regarded as gods to bronze age goat herders. To paraphrase Arthur C Clark "any sufficiently enhanced technologies is indistinguishable from magic" or miracles or gods. There are enhanced human beings by out the bible. interior the Sumerian pills they communicate approximately all 9 planets and the final 3 had no longer been got here across till the final 2 centuries. we are no longer on my own, we not at all have been.
2016-11-26 00:25:12 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All of the above.
Although my real main reason is all the times in history when science has explained some long-believed religious question/belief. Like evolution and creationism. Witchcraft.
I believe in aliens though.
And although I'm not an atheist, I'm agnostic, but definitely close enough.
(Agonostic means I accept that I'm not going to know for sure until I die)
2006-10-27 19:15:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Number three, which is really self-explanatory. However, the incredible immorality of Christianity and the inconsistencies of the Bible count too.
2006-10-27 19:12:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Well, if I had to pick one, I'd pick #1, the inconsistencies, because that one ties in to #3 in the sense that inconsistencies don't make sense. And to me, if something contradicts itself and doesn't make sense, it can't possibly be true. So it's the inconsistencies that do it for me, because my logic can't make sense of them, leading somewhat to #3, which rules it all out for me.
2006-10-28 17:11:37 · answer #5 · answered by Ophelia 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2. Immoral principles of christianity (hell, original sin)
and 4. Or-the hatred, bigotry and supression of scientific research shown to us by the modern day christians
how are you supposed to pick a best answer if we are forced to stick with only 4 options?
2006-10-27 19:14:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
4 then 3...was not born into or raised with it, and so logic and reason were the basis of family values. Which translated into good logical thinking in general and finding religion about too "out there."
2006-10-27 19:50:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have to take 3, though all of them are true. I can't see believing in something for which there is absolutely no proof (the Bible isn't proof, it is a collection of stories and opinions). The way things stand right now, I could no more believe in god than santa.
2006-10-27 19:12:15 · answer #8 · answered by Jensenfan 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
5) all of the above
the thought of worshiping an invisible being who is all-knowing, all-powerful, omnipotent, and both three and one is ignorant. and in all the galaxies, universes, multiverses even, i absolutely refuse to believe humans are the only lifeforms that exist. given that, we -- the earth as a whole -- are but a grain of salt on god's fingertip. what's to say we are the only lifeforms he cares so much about that he's in all of our lives personally? i don't buy it a bit.
on another note, i also refuse to worship something that created a place of infinite torture reserved for anybody who does not abide by his strict laws and ignorant reasoning. anybody or anything that enforces the "my way or the highway" rule so much to the point of if you don't believe everything it says you're gonna burn forever in a firey pit of unpleasantness is obviously abusing power and does not deserve the light of day. and i guarantee any one person who thinks like that / abuses power like that here on earth does not have too many friends... but for some reason it's okay for some invisible being who doesn't even reveal himself to us to "test our faith" to do the same? yeah, okay.
i could go on for hours... but i'll save everyone the trouble. :)
2006-10-27 19:17:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
4. None of the above.
Reading the Torah and with a sound knowledge of Qabbalah, and then looking at the new testament, it is clear that Jesus could not have been messiach.
If I were to be a monotheist, I'd be Jewish, not Christian, because Jesus of Nazareth failed many prophecies and broke many.
2006-10-27 19:14:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋