well if they could prove it that it was an accident then maybe no...but it i think she would get probation or somethin...no idea
2006-10-28 01:59:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, it doesn't matter how good or honest of a person she is, or if she called 911. The law doesn't care about that. What matters, is if there was ANY possible way she could have avoided the accident. Was she speeding, talking on a cell phone, distracted, weaving, failing to signal or negligent in any way? If not, then criminal charges will not be filed, but you can rest assured there will be a civil suit. Just because you hit a pedestrian, doesn't mean it's your fault. I've worked several accidents where it wasn't the drivers fault. In one case, an elderly lady slipped on an icy sidewalk and fell out in front of a vehicle that was being operated lawfully. This is another good reason to obey traffic laws. If you're driving 38mph in a 35mph zone and a kid runs out in front of you, you're screwed. It doesn't matter that the child was unsupervised or that he just darted out from between 2 cars.
2006-10-28 11:41:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by wood_402 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question is too vague. It would depend on the circumstances.
If the lady was driving down the street doing the speed limit and the child darted in front of her, nothing would happen.
If she was drinking from a bottle of Jack Daniels, doing 80, toking on a joint and drove on the sidewalk to hit the kid she would probably do some serious time.
2006-10-28 11:08:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by JOHN 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would depend upon the circumstances around the accident. Potentially the mother of the child might even be found to be negligent if, for instance, the child was a toddler and running about unattended. We need more info to make a more accurate assessment.
2006-10-27 18:30:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Justice 4 All 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, that's the definition of vehicular manslaughter.
It's not premeditated, it wasn't intentional....but a life was taken!
Here's another way to look at it, as it seems you're question is postured to sympathize with the good, honest lady who negligently killed a young child with an automobile.
How do you think you would feel if YOUR child was killed by a good, honest lady driving over your child with her car?
2006-10-27 18:23:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Timothy W 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I hope you're not waiting for answers before dialing 911.
Everything is circumstance, isn't it? Kids are so unpredictable, one could easily dart in the way of a car without anyone having the chance to do anything ... even with a careful driver and watchful parents. There is no way to prevent everything with kids.
If taken to court, I expect it'll all be about circumstance.
2006-10-27 18:30:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by SteveMc 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess it would depend on the state and the circumstances of the accident.I can't even imagine living with the guilt the driver must feel,I still think about the cat I hit 18 years ago.I don't know how I would ever get over hitting a child.
2006-10-28 03:32:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by stellablue1959 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The good, honest lady will have some answers to give an investigator and be willing to pay good, honest consequences for her oversight. Even if she called 911
2006-10-28 00:59:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends. There isn't enough information written to make a good decision.
Was she speeding? Where was the child when he was run over? Is she licensed? Should she have been driving? Did the child die? Has she been ticketed before for the same offense?
2006-10-31 07:07:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Eddie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Two things could happen, but for sure she's going to jail/. She could be charged with Vehicular manslaughter.. a death caused by accident with a vehicles or Negligible Homicide.. A death committed by an act of ignorance. I think it would be the later, because as the operator of the vehicle you are to remain in control at all times. If they can give you a ticket for DWI because your driving TIRED. they will put your butt in jail for sure if you took an life. by accident or not.
2006-10-27 19:33:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by R J 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
My ex and his female chum left 5 infants a while 9 right down to 2 homestead on my own each and every morning for hours mutually as doing a paper path for greater money. i became appalled for this spectacular reason. I pictured our 2yr previous waking previously the different youngsters and looking out something to mild on hearth, strolling out the door, or each and every greater frightening to think of approximately, letting a stranger in. I didnt believe that the 9yr previous could be waiting to handle 4 youthful youngsters in a disaster. infants mature at distinctive fees and a few could be mature adequate to stay homestead for short sessions of time at incredibly early age (in keeping with possibility 10 and older.. for occasion latch-key youngsters), yet i became informed that below no situations ought to that many infants that youthful ever be left homestead with none supervision and that got here from a state investigator for baby shielding centers. On that happy notice, DUHHHH. i be attentive to that I cant turn my back for 2 minutes without my 4yr previous stepping into *something* she has no business enterprise being in. I certainly have a difficult time protecting up together with her and that i'm totally grown and in charge, unlike infants staring at infants. What I dont understand is why those mothers couldnt have long previous to the quick mart previously bedtime for those youngsters (if there became any such component for them) and drank their "one" at homestead. in keeping with possibility if their infants could have been in mattress napping, they woudlnt have required the uhhh relief of a drink.
2016-11-26 00:22:51
·
answer #11
·
answered by cegla 4
·
0⤊
0⤋