I've never heard that.
2006-10-27 16:59:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Serena 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gah! Why is it that when pious people run out of things to say about the things they love to talk about, they start making up stuff and connecting everything to everything else? Give this a week and that loincloth will be connected with everyone in the Bible. It was the rag that Isaiah buried and dug up again. It was David's sling against Goliath. It was Moses' sweatband, Noah's bailing rag and eventually Adam's loincloth, thus completing the cycle of significance. I hope nobody had to pay for that vision.
2006-10-27 17:38:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by skepsis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually, it is not in the scripture where neither act is mentioned nor does it match history where Rome crucified it's fictims naked as one last act of demeanment.
Biblically, it takes two witnesses for an event to be considered confirmed. I'm sorry, but this one doesn't fit.
2006-10-27 17:01:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mary, the mother of Jesus, likely wore a headscarf as was the custom of Jewish women 2,000 years ago. Some Jewish women still wear a headscarf to cover their hair. Some Christian women also wear a headscarf to cover their hair. It is the choice that those women make to do so. It is not mandatory that they cover their hair for religious purposes, it is neither prohibited. To say that Christian women 2,000 years ago covered their hair and therefore that Christian women today ought to do so is non sequitur logic. If a woman wants to cover her hair she may do so. If she chooses not to cover her hair she may do so. A person's belief depends on their heart and mind. A Christian woman will have the fruit of the spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) love, joy, peace, patience, goodness, gentleness, meekness, temperance, mercy and faith.
2016-05-22 02:21:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why not do some research yourself and stop taking other people's opinions for truth.
When the Romans crucified people, men and women, they were stripped of their garment and nailed to the cross naked.><>
2006-10-27 17:15:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by CEM 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Interesting... which Mary are we talking about? Mary Magdelane, or His mother? I'd bet this is a Catholic myth; they have all kinds of stuff they believe about Jesus and Mary that isn't in the Bible.
2006-10-27 17:01:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Free Ranger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it doesn't match any scripture from the King James Bible. maybe it matches up with a work of fiction.
2006-10-27 17:03:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by alienmiss 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sounds like a rumor! 2000 years later, and there's still rumors, well who knows really right? ALL is possible with God.
2006-10-27 17:00:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"someone" said a "visionary" said this? You should be more careful what you believe.
2006-10-27 17:01:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by lost and found 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who cares what he was wearing that is not the most important part of the story.
2006-10-27 16:59:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have never heard that. What scripture?
2006-10-27 16:59:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by Onjel 2
·
0⤊
0⤋