2006-10-27 13:30:04 · 23 answers · asked by Swampy_Bogtrotter 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No he did not take them on board because he needed to conserve water and could not give them anything to drink. I did hear he built a little ark shaped submarine and pulled them along behind. He checked on them daily to see that they did not drown from the flooding waters.
2006-10-27 13:50:04 · answer #1 · answered by happylife22842 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Scientists have certainly got here upon lots evidence of a great flood, in actuality 2 great floods the two happening interior a little while (geologically) of another. the two the Black Sea and the crimson Sea have been as quickly as lush valleys the place early civilization thrived. regrettably, via fact the point of the oceans rose (persevering with end of the final ice age) the sub sea point valleys have been suddenly flooded with the help of a great rush of ocean water. it is, additionally, possibly that those valleys have been an Eden the place people ought to stay to tell the story devoid of want of cultivation. As human beings began to go onto the plains the place they could improve grain greater easily, no longer in basic terms did they carry about authentic civilization they additionally escaped the disaster of the flood.
2016-10-03 01:03:24 · answer #2 · answered by geddings 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No just 1 pair (or 7 pairs if you read the bit from the other version they included in there) of every land animal including birds but not dinosaurs. Fish got out due to a known loophole (God didn't consider them evil apparently).
What I wanna know is where they put all the poo.
Also, I'd like to know is why other religions have flood/death stories like this.
2006-10-27 13:33:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Intelligence tells everyone that there was no need to put fish or sea creatures on the Arch. Why would Noah do that ? He was surrounded by water. It rained for fourty days and nights. As the flood waters would rise the sea creatures would be in their glory. As the flood waters subsided, many would die, out of water. So No, Noah did not take sea or water creatures on the Arch.
2006-10-27 13:53:00 · answer #4 · answered by Norskeyenta 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If you took time to read the bible, you would know that noah won a couple of goldfish at the fair on his way to the ark.
2006-10-27 13:33:55 · answer #5 · answered by Lewisthelab 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Silly Swampy, fish don't breath air.
Only the land creatures, things that had "the breath of life" died in the Flood. Fish and amphibians wouldn't be threatened by this. Perhaps none of the sea creatures were, even though some of them were mammals, and breathing air.
2006-10-27 13:56:47 · answer #6 · answered by MamaBear 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All the saltwater fish and all the freshwater fish somehow happily joined forces in the resulting concoction and rode it out, cleverly finding their way back to the appropriate distribution areas once the water went down again.
2006-10-27 13:39:09 · answer #7 · answered by DoctorScurvy 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Genesis account actually states that all them that have the breath of life, animals and fowls were killed that were not on the ark. Fish, whales, dolphins etc. were not on the ark.
2006-10-27 13:54:32 · answer #8 · answered by 19jay63 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Fish were O.K.. Science tells us that there is a Boundary Layer betweeen Salt Water and Fresh Water. They don''t really mix that well.
2006-10-27 13:38:21 · answer #9 · answered by maguyver727 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Probably not because fish can survive in water and wouldn't really do well on a boat.
2006-10-27 13:40:33 · answer #10 · answered by lianhua 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋