English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've only made chicken stock a few times. Every time, I used the bones of a rotisserie chicken I'd already eaten, and I was happy with the results. However, I have become increasingly aware that recipes seem to call for raw chickens, or just the bones of raw chickens. Would this be better? Most importantly, so you think I'd get more of the nutritional/rejuvenating properties out of the bones if I used raw ones?

2006-10-27 13:22:18 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Food & Drink Cooking & Recipes

12 answers

Yes raw chicken does make a healthier chicken stock on behalf of the marrow in the bones are cooked out into the stalk. Rotisserie chicken has lost a lot of the marrow in the install cooking of the chicken. I find if you remove the skin and fat it is also healthier. Throw in some shallots, some garlic a bundle of fresh basil depending on what the stock is needed for. You can buy store bought chicken stock to have on hand for quick minute meals that is tasty. You can also put up your own stalk when you boil chicken before you put it on the grill.

2006-10-27 14:02:34 · answer #1 · answered by tizzyds 1 · 1 0

You only need a small piece of raw chicken (a leg or a wing) to make stock. The longer you boil it, the better it gets. Most people don't have the patience to stay around & watch for 3 or 4 hours while the stock simmers to release all the nutrients from the bones of the chicken! I put mine in the fridge overnight & skim the fat off of the top BEFORE I use the stock. That way you
re eating way less fat! However, I haven't done this in years, since I am NOW a vegetarian! Nice "meating you!"

2006-10-27 13:38:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I would assume if you use raw bones to make the stock that would add more flavor and nutritional value because you are getting the benefits of the bone marrow. Store bought stock is usually high in sodium (salt) and really does not taste as good. I would also suggest using a free range chicken. Chickens that are bred today enmass usually eat meal, have illnesses and given hormones and antibiotics. So go natural.

2006-10-27 13:33:28 · answer #3 · answered by MadforMAC 7 · 0 0

If you are busy like me then you'll appreciate what I'm about to tell you. When I cook a whole chicken in the crock pot (easy and yummy) it makes the richest chicken stock EVER!!!!!
This is great when you are on the go, you walk into your home in the evening and voile' you have a hot meal waiting on you. You don't need to put any water in with the bird, its juices will cook out.

2006-10-27 15:45:05 · answer #4 · answered by Ernimay 4 · 0 0

Chicken Stock

1 whole free-range chicken (about 3½ pounds), rinsed, giblets discarded
2 carrots, cut in large chunks
3 celery stalks, cut in large chunks
2 large white onions, quartered
1 head of garlic, halved
1 turnip, halved
¼ bunch fresh thyme
2 bay leaves
1 teaspoon whole black peppercorns

Place the chicken and vegetables in a large stockpot over medium heat. Pour in only enough cold water to cover (about 3 quarts); too much will make the broth taste weak. Toss in the thyme, bay leaves, and peppercorns, and allow it to slowly come to a boil. Lower the heat to medium-low and gently simmer for 1 to 1½ hours, partially covered, until the chicken is done. As it cooks, skim any impurities that rise to the surface; add a little more water if necessary to keep the chicken covered while simmering.
Carefully remove the chicken to a cutting board. When its cool enough to handle, discard the skin and bones; hand-shred the meat into a storage container.

Carefully strain the stock through a fine sieve into another pot to remove the vegetable solids. Use the stock immediately or if you plan on storing it, place the pot in a sink full of ice water and stir to cool down the stock. Cover and refrigerate for up to one week or freeze.

2006-10-27 13:32:30 · answer #5 · answered by windy288 6 · 0 2

Use raw chicken. Chicken feet make the best stock.

2006-10-27 13:30:48 · answer #6 · answered by The professor 4 · 1 0

I always use raw chicken. Using a whole chicken is the most flavourful, but I've also done it using legs and backs.

2006-10-28 03:23:44 · answer #7 · answered by Lydia 7 · 0 0

I want uncooked. Heating meat destroys meals. And cooked bones are risky to dogs. in case you feed cooked you may could basically feed meat, no bones, and bones are sturdy for dogs' teeth as nicely as a resource of calcium. A wholesome dogs can consume uncooked meat with out lots situation for the micro organism in it. If a dogs has a pre-modern-day wellbeing situation or is immune-comprimised, uncooked poultry could desire to be risky and the dogs won't be waiting to handle the micro organism, and could desire to alter into ill. So if it is so cooking is greater suitable. A meals recurring of basically poultry isn't balanced, it lacks many meals, quite Zinc. So different meats and organs could be extra to create a balanced meals recurring.

2016-10-16 11:44:36 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Using rotisserie bones just gives you a deeper flavor. My preference.

2006-10-27 13:35:48 · answer #9 · answered by Annie Hightower 3 · 1 0

I like using the carcass from roasted chicken. It's already seasoned. I don't think it makes a difference, if anything it's better!

2006-10-27 13:26:52 · answer #10 · answered by chefgrille 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers