Why do people claim that seperation of church and state does not exist (See details)?

Question

"Congree shall make no law respecting a establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
- First Ammendment of the US Constitution -

This is pretty obvious, no law is to have anything to do with religion...

Sarah: Yes you can, but teachers cannot lead any kind of prayer session because it would impede on everyone else's rights. Nothing stops individual children from praying in schools...

Jewel_Flower: Separtation of church and state is becoming stronger, and is being applied more and more every day...

Happrgirl: Yes, but anything that would elevate one religion over the other (i.e prayer in public schools) is not allowed because it impedes on other's right to worship freely. Nativity scenes are fine, as long as they are not created with taxpayer dollars.

Answer 1

they chose the parts of the law they want to so it fits what they want to believe and blind themselves to or try to change the rest

Answer 2

Because it says "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" and often the term "separation of church and state" is used to "prohibit the free exercise of religion" on any public land. It's clear that the founding fathers did not intend to keep all religion out of the public realm and government--they established prayers in Congress and put up the Ten Commandments in public buildings. They saw no conflict in having a Nativity Scene on public land. The concern the founding fathers express clearly is that the government stay out of the church and not require anyone to be a member of any particular church or faith in order to maintain their rights as citizens and human beings.

The term "separation of church and state" actually comes from the Federalist Papers and not the Constitution.

Answer 3

The separation of church and state does no longer recommend that non secular each physique won't be in touch in the legislative or perhaps the judicial technique. It potential that no unmarried faith would be used by way of fact the regulation of the state. instead, regulations would be written and used in accordance to the ideals of maximum individuals of the individuals and their elected representatives. nicely, if maximum individuals of the each physique is Christian, the regulations they approve could have a Christian aptitude notwithstanding it does no longer recommend that the regulations of Christianity are unavoidably our regulations. In a state like the U. S., each and each new subject is open to talk. In a non secular state, regulations that come from the state faith can not be changed. the commonplace electorate opinion isn't valued and you may additionally be punished for having an opinion. in this way, placing apart 'church' (synagogue or mosque) from state is achievable.

Answer 4

I think what people are talking about are not requirements to attend a particular church. What upsets them is that there are laws that enforce values of people's religions. I am not talking about do not murder, but laws that do not protect other people from people's selfishness.

Examples of laws merely enforce religious values without protecting others from potential harm from their fellowman:

marriage between man and woman

sex should only be in the missionary position (several states have this law on the books)

Answer 5

Fantastic, the way you included the actual sentence from the constitution.
Now, if there were only a way to get eveyone who does not know the real meaning of this to tatoo it to there forhead. And, for those who don't understand what that states to get out of the habit of telling us that Bush, or any elected official, should stop giving God credit for what is going on.
God is in control...not mere man.
thanks.

Answer 6

But Congress is ALSO not supposed to prohibit the free exercise of religion, and that's what many proponents of "separation of church and state" want. They want to prohibit a person's right to the free exercise of their religion in the political arena.

Answer 7

It is terrible that it was the intent of our founding fathers to protect God from our government, and yet satan and his sevants have use this truth to "protect" the government from God.

The only Constitution that ever contained the words "separation of church and state" was that of the former USSR.

Answer 8

Because in the 1950's our goverment added 'in god we trust' to the money and 'under god' to our pledge. In those two intances, the state was not seperate from a theistic belief.

Answer 9

It does still exist - for a little longer. But don't assume that's permanent. It won't last. It's quickly disappearing.

Answer 10

well then if we want to exercise our religion in public places such as schools, then we can!!