Women in 2006?

Question

I just want to know if women think it's against the law to approach guys. I mean everything doesn't have to be so damn old fashioned. If a woman likes a guy then why can't the woman ask the guy out or something.

It kills me when I see questions on here like " how can i get him to ask me out". What the hell is that. It's 2006 and I think if you like a guy then ask him out and stop waiting for him to make the first move. Sometimes guys are the one's who is shy. Personally I like woman who are aggressive, it's hot. I am not one of the shy types, I am mainly the aggressor but it would be nice for it to be the other way around. SOMETIMES

I guess what I am trying to say is what's up with that? Why can't more women go after what they want?

Answer 1

I think that many women today do, but they are less direct about it and go around the bushes with men because they still subconsciously beleive that a man would see them as being too forward. And guess what?, they are right for thinking that because a lot of men do think a woman is too forward if she is the one doing the chasing and usually because it is still largely beleived that the man should be the one doing it.

It shouldn't be this way and more enlightened men like yourself, wouldn't think a woman too forward, but men like yourself are few and far between because many do still live in the darker age and do prefer to do the chasing because he wants to be the one that selects the girl.

When I was a teenager, some years ago now, I used to very popular in school and all of the guys liked me but I never fancied any of them at the time (only usually the ones that were far less easier to get) and when I did my chasing, the guys really didn't respond very well and ran a mile despite being very attractive, so this tells you something doesn't it?. This was only just over ten years ago now, but even now, when I get close to being the one to initiate something with a guy, he backs away and not because I am any less attractive, but because they are the ones that want to be doing it.

You are right though and things would be a lot more easier if a woman was to make the first move with a man, but it needs to be made acceptable by society first. If a man has affairs for example, it is not as bad as if a woman did and she would be labelled in a very different light, so this is why women are very cautious about taking the lead role.

Answer 2

Well ive always been a straight forward woman and if i like what i see i went after it.Ive never had a problem with asking a guy out on a date.

Women these days are still listening to what they mother was taught which aint bad but at the sametime they might see someone that they like but dont approach them.That person might the man of there dreams. but they wil never know until they take that chance and make the first move.

Answer 3

The task of the President isn't to symbolize his celebration, even though Barack Obama is doing his great to difference that. The task of the President is to symbolize the desire of the humans. This unique invoice handed the condominium with an close to unanimous vote, so even supposing the President had vetoed it, it could have come again with the two/three vote quintessential to override the veto. So your end, no less than concerning the 2006 passage, is right - despite the fact that you mainly could had been larger off bringing up the House vote alternatively than the President's signature. More just lately, nevertheless, there was once extra general dissent amongst Republicans, and dissent that had rather plenty of advantage. As with such a lot expenditures like this, wide aid a few of the populace is founded at the TITLE of the laws, no longer the precise content material. Are you mindful, for illustration, that on this laws an Anglo partner, accused of spousal abuse on an Indian Reservation is area to tribal regulation, no longer US regulation? Remember, that during US regulation, residents have the correct to an legal professional, the correct to stand their accuser, the presumption of innocence till tested responsible, and the correct to a tribulation through a jury in their friends. Is this the case in Indian Tribunals? Do you even recognise what an Indian Tribunal is, and what the foundations are? What if the accusations are fake? This was once a important side of the Republican competition to the regulation, and it was once defeated. Of path, we by no means quite heard something approximately this - all we ever heard was once that Republicans are anti-Woman, professional-Spouse Abuse. The different objections Republicans (and notably Conservatives) have approximately this regulation revolve across the vigor of the relevant govt as opposed to the sovereignty of the character states. This regulation reduplicates and supersedes current state regulation and engages in some thing informally referred to as "Mission Creep" - which means that slowly, methodically, regulation through regulation, the sovereignty of the states and their potential to go and put into effect their possess legislation is overtaken through the government - in direct competition to the stability referred to as for within the Constitution. The query on this case must be "Are the states doing an ample task protective ladies in instances of home violence?", however in the entire exposure that this invoice acquired the presumption was once that there was once NO statute, and if the Federal Government didn't do some thing, not anything could be performed, and once more, should you had been in contrast invoice the one end viable could be that you're in opposition to ladies. I am no longer in opposition to ladies, however I AM in opposition to lies and mis characterizations. EDIT - consistent with your remark - it is a lovely well assumption that a "NO" vote could be in opposition to beef, however on this case it is not - it is a major objection to 2 very, very harmful provisions of the regulation that experience quite not anything to do with violence in opposition to ladies.

Answer 4

Ok its 2006 but women are still sl*ts if they sleep around right ? When that old fashioned mentality leaves then and only then might I consider asking a man out.

Answer 5

I go after what I want when I want. I have had three bfs @ once. I have no problem asking a hot guy out. Sometimes I stop because of fear of rejection, but I think we are just afraid at times.

Answer 6

Some women do, but this forum seems to be becoming a wimp magnet. But it's not just the girls, of course. Guys are asking this question, too. Kudos to you for giving us aggressive girls props.

Answer 7

are you kidding...women have been asking men out as long as i have been a live any ways. that's more then 50 years.woman have been going after what they want all the way back to Adam and eve.you are the one who need to catch up with the times........

Answer 8

I was the one to ask out my finace and I was the one to make the 1st move. Women like that are out there.

Answer 9

I know right?? But some guys don't like when girls walk up to them because then they think we're too aggressive.Aren't you ever satisfied.