2006-10-27 09:17:53 · 11 answers · asked by sunshine 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
its been going on in somepeoples lives
2006-10-27 09:19:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At any given time in history, there are numerous wars and conflicts going on. Currently there are 40+/- conflicts in the world. The only time the WORLD WAR status is attibuted to a war is when the superpowers square off on opposite sides in open declarations of war. We are far from that scenario, altho i agree the spark is there to ignite a larger conflagaration. But for now, just think regional conflicts, proxy wars, brinksmanship, sabre rattling and disagreements between rump states.
When the US, Russia and/or China square, then come back and we'll talk WW III. The history books haven't declared the Cold War as WWIII or the current war on terror as WWIV. You'll know when WWIII hits, that burst of EMP will be your first warning....
2006-10-27 19:22:50 · answer #2 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not yet, but the stage is being set. The world has been on the verge of World War III since the ending of World War II.
2006-10-27 09:26:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most likely. There has been a major break down in allies with a lot of nations. Right now there is radical Islam...and I specifically say RADICAL Islam. Not everyone who Islam is bad. But it is turning into America and Israel vs Islam. A lot of Islamic countries hate the US and Israel. Our allies have a choice to chose sides, and as time goes on ties with our allies are becoming strained. Iraq is only the beginning and not having UN support is a big part of it.
2006-10-27 09:30:21 · answer #4 · answered by xcaliber1117 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but were on our way there we are in the pre-stages of one
4-7 years tops the way things are going.
2006-10-27 09:29:35 · answer #5 · answered by markm 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it already has. the next step is to completely irradicate peoples constitutional rights for the sake of security but as benjamin franklin always said
"Those that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety."
2006-10-27 09:26:41 · answer #6 · answered by Red Eye 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not yet, but leave it to the current world leaders to find a way to make it happen.
2006-10-27 09:26:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is splitting allies apart, so we're in the beginning of it. Hopefully the next president can correct his mistakes.
2006-10-27 09:27:10 · answer #8 · answered by irish_mick_25 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It began back during the Carter administration when Iran took over our embassy and took our diplomats hostage.
2006-10-27 09:25:45 · answer #9 · answered by Yak Rider 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just keep your eyes on the news. Youll have your awnser soon enough.
2006-10-27 14:22:34 · answer #10 · answered by ascent_against 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋