Not so that it would kill anyone. Just a good jolt, so they won't try again.
2006-10-27 08:42:38 · 11 answers · asked by jim 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I think it's a great idea!
2006-10-27 08:47:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Agreed. Lets go one step further and put a mote in front so they get wet before they reach the fence.
2006-10-27 15:45:36 · answer #2 · answered by only p 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I Like The Red Line ^ Idea
And any one that crosses this line would be shot.
http://nerdnirvana.org/g4m3s/borderpatrol.htm
2006-10-27 16:37:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be too expensive to power and repair. There'd be dead birds and rodents all along the fence too.
2006-10-27 16:47:23 · answer #4 · answered by Barry 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good idea. Like 2,000,000 volts. Then the poor people could harvest the dead wildlife for food.A 2 purpose fence.More bang for the tax $$$'s
2006-10-27 15:48:44 · answer #5 · answered by STIFLE IT LIBS 1 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why don't you draw a red line between the boarder. And any one that crosses this line. would be shot. I think during the cowboy days this is what they did. What a morbid mine you have. As to answer your question? HELL NO.........................
2006-10-27 16:16:52 · answer #6 · answered by wondering 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do but I think if it's going to electric it should be strong enough to REALLY make a difference...if you get my drift
2006-10-27 15:46:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good idea but only if CA pays the tab!
2006-10-27 15:45:27 · answer #8 · answered by Fast Eddie B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In theory, that would be great! In reality, that would just be more expensive to repair every morning.
2006-10-27 15:45:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think it should be a 30 foot concrete wall.
2006-10-27 15:48:39 · answer #10 · answered by Hugh Jass 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋