oh, you're going to Hell, little missy
2006-10-27 03:15:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
This misconception (no body's fault), may be ascribed to lack of information and adequate presentation, on the private activities of women, in the good old early days of the Bible. Women, as it is, had enough problems, in the olden days and the Bible has throughout been designed not to harm or aggravate existing problems (at any moment in time), but, instead help (and alleviate human / social problems of) every person, irrespective of gender. The Holy Bible, like many other developed nations, is respectful of mothers, daughters, sisters and the girl child, who are supposed to be (real / symbolic) representatives of purity, in human society. This does NOT deprive the "physically stronger gender" of the dignity / purity that he and his likes deserve, duly and righteously. In many cases, which do not require stipulation, the word "he" is supposed to imply "all persons (human), irrespective of gender." One ought to read latest versions of the Bible (NIV), where there are distinct "notes" on how to interpret the word "he." The Bible has NOT given authority / permission, to any person, to indulge in any sort of "activities," which are considered "perverted," by human SOCIETY.
2006-10-27 01:42:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sam 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Romans, chapter 1 verse 26
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
This is the scripture showing homosexuality for women is a sin.
2006-10-27 01:40:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Born Again Christian 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The bible mentions women also. Same passage but some of the translation has left it out. Look it up in the King James version and it says Men with men and woman with woman in the story of sodam and gamora.
2006-10-27 01:02:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by bildymooner 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
In those days people couldn't even concieve of two women being together. They thought of women as submissive and inferior, the idea of a woman taking the dominant role in a relationship was so absurd to them that they didn't bother to mention it.
2006-10-27 01:26:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Bible condemns all fornication. Sexual intimacy with those of the same gender, whether male or female, falls under the Greek term for fornication.
Hannah
2006-10-27 01:01:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hannah J Paul 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, these sections of the Bible was written by men, and men have always sort of liked the idea.
-Seriously, I have no idea. But, I may not be entirely wrong!
2006-10-27 01:01:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by silvercomet 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Technically speaking if you had sex with anyone regardless of gender that you are not wed to you have sinned. People sin all the time. Nobody is "safe."
2006-10-27 01:01:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jennifer F 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Intercourse was set up to be between one man and one woman for the extent of their lives. Doing it any other way goes against it's purpose and intent, is not natural, and is harmful to both your body and soul.
Forget the whole "sin" part, it's just plain bad for you.
2006-10-27 01:03:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by arewethereyet 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
its the wasting of "seed" that causes men to be condemned versus women
2006-10-27 01:02:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by The Ego 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
God likes to watch, even though god has no sex. If god was a woman, things would be set up a lot differently. If god was a male, women would have a third breast, one in the middle of their back ..............for slow dancing
2006-10-27 01:41:28
·
answer #11
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋