Men are sexually active till the age of 80 however their spouces become sexually inactive around 40s. So please tell me as to what married men should do to satisfy their libido. In this case why they should not date other willing girls. Isn't it better than visiting sex workers. Please give honest answers. No moral science classes please
2006-10-26 21:43:35 · 19 answers · asked by answer pro 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
First of all that is wrong...I'm 46 and more sexually active now than ever. The men are the ones who lose their ability to have sex. That's why older women go for younger guys.
Guys sexual peak is in their 20s.
2006-10-26 21:47:43 · answer #1 · answered by th25tina 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I 'm here to tell you that I am way beyond 40 and I am active sexually.
Have you ever thought perhaps it is you that's the reason your wife is not sexually active. Maybe you are boring maybe you need to get a little more creative in ways to satisfy your wife, before she starts looking elsewhere.
2006-10-26 21:56:48 · answer #2 · answered by yakity_one 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who told you women become sexually inactive in their 40's. That is nonsense. I know women in their 70's who are still going strong. Slower than before, but still working at it.
Nothing wrong with older women. The sex might not be much good, but the breakfasts are lovely.
2006-10-26 21:48:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
What sources are you consulting that say women become sexually inactive in their 40's? Lots of women are having sex into their 60's now! So I wouldn't be stating such nonsense until I had my facts straight.
2006-10-26 21:47:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
this has to be the biggest tall tale i've ever heard women's libidos dont slow down in their 40's. and no straying from your partner and martial bed is not a good substitue for prostitues. tehre are ways and things to do to keep the sex life active when you hit the golden years. taht's what a marriage is... making issues like these work!
2006-10-26 21:49:29 · answer #5 · answered by ccdavis01 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know where you got your stats from cos around that age woman are pretty active.
Anyway if that situation was to come about hes more than welcome to go get it somewhere else, so long as he takes all his gear with him too. I'm not gonna be getting all emotionally f*cked up cos he doesn't want to use is hand. If the tables were turned I know you wouldn't let your partner go out and screw someone else. Why should it be different??
2006-10-26 21:52:02 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iam not giving any moral science classes but loyalty ,responsibility and love is something what keep a guy from all these extra things
2006-10-26 21:50:09 · answer #7 · answered by Heer J 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
lol i've got self belief like answering this.... First i'm a guy, 2d, i'm no longer into guy. ok.... He look commonplace, yet look at him, effective teeth + sturdy epidermis (greater suitable than me a minimum of), and that heat/style smile... the only down area is his hair... i think of his bro in simple terms think of that he could look or act slightly "no longer so manly"? in simple terms exchange hair style... i'm a guy, and that i do no longer think of he's gruesome.
2016-10-16 11:13:22 · answer #8 · answered by shea 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You don't NEED to always release yourself, do you?? No seriously. I seriously think it's all in your mind. There are men who don't have to.
Maybe you should just focus on a new hobby with your wife. That's fair.
2006-10-26 22:21:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where did you hear that? I just turned 50 and I'm very active. It just takes a little longer. (more foreplay) My mothe had my youngest brother when she was 41, and I promise you it wasn't a virgin birth.
2006-10-26 21:48:01 · answer #10 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋