2006-10-26 15:19:40 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes, of course. Why not? A couple with children is a family. (There are other possibilities, but that is certainly one.)
2006-10-26 15:27:27 · answer #1 · answered by Maple 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree that society ought to additionally seem at polygamy, despite the fact that that's a separate issue from gay marriage. If/as quickly as we are waiting to renowned polygamy then we would desire to consistently be attentive to how all companions interior the marriage would be cared for an secure, how infants would be cared for and guarded, etc. i do no longer think of that's thoroughly out of the question or unworkable... despite the fact that it desires some deep theory and there might choose for to be a severe felony learn executed to confirm it would not replace right into a platform for abuse. Marriage is a civil perfect, this became usual interior the Loving v. Virginia case. those with a companion stay longer, have much less well-being issues, and are greater valuable then their single counter-factors. we would desire to consistently initiate with coming up a good taking part in field for *all* human beings, previously we branch off and start to locate selection numerical marriage preparations.
2016-11-25 22:38:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whether they include them or not, it seems they're a family. How is this inferior to an outwardly "normal, All-American" family where the husband is a drunken wife-beater, for example?
2006-10-26 15:23:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, that isnt a family, that is playing "house" in an attempt to legitimize their illicit ways.
When two dudes can have a baby on their own, we will talk.
Men need women, and women need men. End of discussion.
2006-10-26 15:23:06 · answer #4 · answered by oldstalecheeks 2 · 0⤊ 5⤋
they wont coz the majority are fundies.
im just happy im not an American.
2006-10-26 15:22:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
that questions should've started with a, SHOULDN'T americans....
2006-10-26 15:22:53 · answer #6 · answered by pba_ams_eahb 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
yes, they should--you didn't predict how many responses this time
2006-10-26 15:23:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I already do.
2006-10-26 15:34:52 · answer #8 · answered by N 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I believe we already do.
2006-10-26 15:22:09 · answer #9 · answered by normobrian 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
It would be very degrading.
2006-10-26 15:23:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋