is the british government guilty of incitement of violence ?

Question

we all live in a very scary environment ? the british goverment along with the bush administration , have systemattically focused on the minorites , primarally muslims , who as i understand have occupied our shores long before 9/11 , how convenient that prior to that terrible day they have chose to ignore any racial / religious tension ? thats because it was never there , they are merely using the minorities as a scapegoat too divert the attrocites that are being carried out in mainly muslim countrys ? i dont recall the german citizens, who lived in the uk at the time of world war two being asked what was in the bag in case they had a bomb in it .the government are guilty of creating MASS hysteria along with bush , and they will be brought to book with countless and unnessary deaths of british soldiers in the middle east .
they are cannon fodder , same as world war one , to prove a point , to a government who has to show strength? crazy

Answer 1

I infer from your bad spelling that you are probably too young to remember WW2. Had you been alive you would remember that Germans suspected of being a security threat weren't asked to open their bags, they were interned in camps as enemy aliens.

Answer 2

Your point:There was never any racial/religious tension before 9/11?
My rebuttal:Oh, how very wrong. Crusades, Catholics/Jews, Catholics/Protestants, Bradford race riots (1982). There was also inter ethnic community riots such as asians on blacks or hindus/muslims (also present in india/pakistan). So would you like to rethink that argument?

Your point: Germans never searched for bombs
My rebuttal: The first time a suicide bombing occured (with the bombs being carried on the person or in a car) was in 1981. Before that bombs were too big, anyway Germans/Austrians in Britain at the time would have been used as spies as in WWII it was an actual war so planes were used for bombing and in WWI it was a war away from peoples houses using specific lines/fronts of fighting. Even if it was possible for a german to bomb a british establishment it would all be theoretical as all germans inside the state were arrested and detained and all on holiday were not allowed to re-enter the country (eg - Austrain JEW is a families nanny, they go on holiday to guernsey, teh war breaks out she is not allowed to return as she is an enemy even though this happened in WWII and she was a jew! Later Germans capture Guernsey, police round up teh jews and send them to france where they are sent to the death camps).

Your Point: Mass hysteria
My rebuttal: After 7/7 did the british reserve falter? NO, Britain is not a nation who takes things lying down! People gave victims a cup of tea or they were brought to hospital. The only effects were entire public transport in london closed for the day, ONE DAY! I believe AMERICA is perhaps guilty of this mass hysteria but Britain is not, due to it's history of taking other people's land it knows how to deal with insurgents (freedom fighters in Zimbabwe/Ireland). People in britain do not actually believe half the rubbish the government comes out with, there might be some problems with the white trash on the dole sometimes being rascist pigs but generally we are a very tolerant country!

In Summary:The populations of britain from whatever community know that the british government and it's agencies (MI5/MI6/Police/British Transport Police/HM Customs and Excise/Civil Nuclear Constabulary/Army/Royal Navy/Royal Air Force) will do their utmost to protect this country and it's citizens. When there was a scare at Heathrow the MOD put tanks on the ground, when there were british citizens in trouble in Lebanon the Navy evacuated them, when the firemen went on strike The Royal Marines (and other army/navy units) manned the pumps and protected this great nation! So, the British people (subjects and residents) know that even though sometimes the government may be acting in a way that they don't like they will be looked after.

Answer 3

Politicians use languge in an eccentric way. If in an consumer-friendly courtroom i'm accused of incitement (say) to homicide, the prosecution might desire to tutor that i actually incited - i.e. inspired, egged on, persuaded - somebody to do it. To a flesh presser, I seem "inciting to violence" if I say that somebody is a bad chap and could be stored a watch on, or if I ***** approximately some community's nasty behavior. The good judgment seems that in the event that they get aggravated at my comments, they might attempt to kick my head in, or that somebody else ought to get so flow that he will attempt to conquer up my opponent. the undeniable fact that I neither willed nor welcomed such an result's, to a flesh presser, neither here nor there. in this foundation, each and every standard election i will bear in mind has contained such incitements from all political events. i seem forward to G. Brown being banned from the rustic via J. Smith thinking his comments in Parliament ought to incite some citizen to violence on one component or the different. till that occurs, we want no longer take G. Brown or J. Smith heavily. in keeping with possibility no longer even then.

Answer 4

There used to be an antipathy of Irish Catholics because of the IRA border campaign during 1935-1945 (financed largely by Nazi Germany), and also during "The Troubles in the 60's and 70's". It has happened before, and will happen again.

Answer 5

I don't think that succesive governments have ignored race riots in the UK.
Even if the Germans (and other nationalities) who were interned during WWII had not been locked up, it is very unlikely that they would have been 'searched for bombs' because bombs were much larger then, and also the concept of suicide bombing as we know it did not exist.

Answer 6

A long winded verbose question…I’m not sure what you’re talking about - questions should be succinct.

In your rambling question you mentioned something about the Germans not being searched...well actually they were interned during World War 2.

Answer 7

The gov has armed the police and this is the quickest way to ensure that guns become widespread in our country so yes they are guilty of inciting violence .

with regards to the rest i have always said that laws against racism are in fact what causes racism .

Answer 8

I don't recall any German citizens blowing themselves and everyne around them, to smithereens just to prove a point. Interesting that you should mention "recalling" the Germans - many of them were imprisoned. I think the charge was treason.

Answer 9

Yes they are, and also guilty of causing racial hatred by trying to subdue christian festivals and xmas in case it offends other cultures, mainly the muslim communities. Doing this only stirs thingsup. Fiona bruce was told by the B.B.C. to remove her cross and chain on telly in case it offended other religions. As for the buisness over jack straw and the veil, How would the muslim lady concerned have reacted if jack straw was wearing a veil when she went to see him. And is it legal for muslim women to wear these veils when driving around?

Answer 10

It is no good asking this of the British government the question should be directed to their masters George Bush and co.