English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I believe that some celebrities, journalists, teachers, community leaders and educators with a good dose of common sense and understanding would make better national leaders than all those fat cats in Washington.

2006-10-26 07:19:12 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Civic Participation

26 answers

oprah .. then she will give all us free cars ..

2006-10-26 07:20:38 · answer #1 · answered by jack jack 7 · 2 2

Anderson Cooper, definitively. Oprah is too self conscious and big headed to be effective, Angelina Jolie? Well, I think that's a no brainer. At least Anderson Cooper would fix the corruption in government, at the very least, put the people responsible in the public eye and categorically, unequivocally, announce that "THIS IS A NO SPIN ZONE! " But really though, I don't think it would be a good idea. He would be so 'bent' on his approval ratings to really be concerned about the policies and impact of their decisions that a REAL President would have to face than to really lead and be effective.

2006-10-28 13:05:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

None of them. Jolie has no understanding of the world situation beyond child starvation; which is a great and just cause, but is not the complete picture. Cooper would be the best choice out of the three. He has been all over the world and actually witnessed significant events which make up the world situation, but I don't believe he has the heart, or lack thereof, to be a politician. The same goes for Oprah. She is a great person who has done lots of things for the disadvantaged, but she is not qualified to be President. She is way too nice, and her huge heart would get in the way of her making the hard decisions.

2006-10-26 07:27:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I don't think there are any celebrities that would make a good president. The skills that made them celebrities in the first place have no correlation to their ability to run a country. Popularity is a silly reason to let someone be president.
Now, some of the teachers and community leaders -- sure! They have more relevant experience...

2006-10-26 07:23:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Hilary, stated heavily by potential of using Oprah. Angelina does no longer have that type of useful journey, i've got have been given no longer have been given self perception. Has she been some thing distinctive than an actress, or dealt with the style of economic judgements that Oprah has?

2016-12-28 05:34:30 · answer #5 · answered by shiner 3 · 0 0

Anderson Cooper.....he is well versed in politics, educated, compassionate, fair, intelligent, would be a great diplomat on the forgeign stage, would be fair and understanding of the AVERAGE American....not just the 1% of the wealthiest, thus would be a great domestic policies president as well!

2006-10-26 20:15:47 · answer #6 · answered by Pie's_Guy 6 · 1 0

Anderson Cooper.

2006-10-26 07:27:06 · answer #7 · answered by mei-lin 5 · 2 1

Celebrities as president could be very bad.....look at Ronald Reagan....

But, considering your choices:

Oprah would have the best chance of winning because she already has such power over America.

Angelina would be interesting because she is such a humanitarian...might be sorta like Pres. Carter

Anderson Cooper is a strong individual and has overcome a lot...he would be an in the trenches sort of guy.

Maybe we could combine all three into one superpresident....whom would of course be a woman....

2006-10-26 07:34:23 · answer #8 · answered by LothLorien 2 · 0 1

I would totally be for Angelina Jolie and Oprah running together. You would have a a great peace maker and a woman who worked hard to get where she has. It would be great.

2006-10-27 18:38:02 · answer #9 · answered by divochka79 3 · 1 0

Anderson Cooper, based purely on the fact that he's the closest to the lot of them to any political action. The other two are in media, and pardon me for saying this, but politics should stay in politics and media should stay in media. Not that they could be good, but they'd seriously need to beef up on actual politics.

2006-10-26 08:22:54 · answer #10 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1 1

This is solid proof that people are systematically being brainwashed by TV.
I'd still love to hear Angelina's state of the union and make statistics of people jerking off at the time.

2006-10-26 07:30:24 · answer #11 · answered by Pishisauraus 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers