2006-10-26 06:15:35 · 4 answers · asked by peter_day123 2 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Other - Pregnancy & Parenting
ask her!
2006-10-26 06:22:38 · answer #1 · answered by san 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i might purely provide that to human beings I seen difficult workers, who have been an asset to my corporation, using fact those are the fashion of persons you does no longer choose for to lose. i might attempt to establish some style of in workplace baby care, that way mom and dad could be close to their youngsters for the time of breaks. i do no longer think of it would impact my business enterprise thinking i might purely approve a hundred% maternity and paternity leave for difficult workers who have been components, no longer lazy people who you will possibly certainly like to fireside, yet you cant using fact their pregnant and ought to declare discrimination. i does no longer pay a hundred% paternity leave to adult males who weren't married to the mum of their infants, using fact there could be no actual way of verifying regardless of if he and the mum of the baby lived mutually. A paternity leave for an single guy who might or won't stay with the mum could be the equivalent of a paid leave, it extremely is ridiculous if he's no longer spending time with the toddler and bonding with it, for this reason the term paternity leave.
2016-11-25 21:53:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DO SHE HAVE A JOB THAT IS PAYING HER UNDER THE TABLE BECAUSE THAT'S THE ONLY WHY I THINK THERE WOULD NOT BE ANY INCOME TAX BEING PAID OR MAYBE SHE ISN'T FILING. WHEN YOU FIND OUT THE RIGHT ANSWER LET KNOW.
2006-10-26 06:33:34 · answer #3 · answered by tooshort4u 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe she upped the count on her W4.
2006-10-26 07:07:29 · answer #4 · answered by kate 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋