Is evolutionism a faith or science?

Answer 1

Many scientists are now admitting what they have known privately for years:believing in evolution reqiures an act of blind faith. Since the facts do not prove evolution,since the fossil record does not show any transition from one species to another,since "scientific" dating methods have been proven unreliable,we have to remember that for those who desperately don't want to believe in God,evolution is a religion of the last resort.
"Faith is the substance of fossils hoped for,the evidence of links not seen."

Those supposedly omniscient scientists who still teach evolution as though it were fact are finally being seen for what they are...frail men willing to believe a lie because it helps them avoid the truth.
The belief that Darwin's theory of evolution is unstable is based on scientific fact,not religious beliefs.It is unfortunate that many scientists have accepted evolution as fact because of their philosophical beliefs rather than scientific logic.Many have been subjective,rather than objective,in their approach to science as a result.Theur investigations are naturally biased toward discovering facts that support only their beliefs.
" Science became in a sense a scientific religion:almost all scienists have accepted it and many are prepared to bend their observations to fit within it."

And the public is blindly and faithfully accepting everything science says,with or without ABSOLUTE proof.Sounds like faith to me.

Answer 2

Evolution has, always will be a theory. It has not been proven. The problem with evolution is that it's principles account for why some individual members of species will certainly outlive, that is survive, other members of the same species group depending on the contributing factors such as food availablity and so on.
However we humans are worth more than mere animals. we are not like the animals. Evolution has not and can never be scientific proven. it can be called a science theory. but what experiments have proved it ?

Answer 3

This quote greater useful represents Mathews perspectives on evolution: Mendel confirmed that inheritance is particulate, that 'factors' interior the genotype transmit the characters expressed via the phenotype. This discovery, mixed with the becoming awareness of the chromosomes and their behaviour interior the maturation of reproductive cells, became the inspiration of the widespread self-discipline of genetics, which printed how evolution via organic decision of random adjustments interior the climate or 'genes' or of their diversifications and mixtures proceeds. ... over the final fifty years genetics has unravelled lots of the fairly complicated phenomena of inheritance, and has tutor that evolution via organic decision of random mutations, usually of small length, is a logical rationalization of the beginning place of the sizeable array of organisms now and interior the previous residing on earth. the theory is so attainable that maximum biologists settle for it as though it have been a shown fact, regardless of the undeniable fact that their conviction rests upon circumstantial data; it varieties a passable faith on which to base our interpretation of nature.

Answer 4

The "mechanism" is copiously observed. It is science from all angles.

Disbelief in evolution is ignorance and/or faith.

Answer 5

Evolution is a science.

Evolutionism is a made up word that Creationists use to try and make it seem a faith.

Answer 6

Its a lie, definitly not science, science is something you can observe and test, evolution is a thought in satans head

Answer 7

Science

Evolution is based upon evidence. Religion is based upon faith, as there is no evidence to support it.

Answer 8

evolution is based on science,C Darwin was only half rite

Answer 9

The fossil record and time line is a fact and is science.

The mechanism is faith, and science assumes that it will one day be understood.

Answer 10

a scientific theory, to me.