Did you really read the article? It said that in mice, stem cells injected into the brain showed some, but not all characteristics of cancer, when viewed under the microscope. Nor did it behave like cancer in vivo. That is the headline that the media "interpretation" of the findings ran, thinking it would garner readership, therefore advertising dollars.
2006-10-26 06:37:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by finaldx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A cancer, by definition, is a cell who's machinery for reproduction has gone haywire. The cell grows and grows, disrupting the other normal cells around it, and if it is in an organ, compromising it's function.
Blood cancers, like leukemia and lymphoma are stem cell cancers, of a sort. The bone marrow produces any number of cell types, lymphocytes, leukocyts, red cells, platelets, plasma cells, etc.
In the article, they specifically mention that the oldest stem cells, those that had undergone over 120 replications, that's 120 generations in cellular time. These cells developed a defective telomerase gene, which could not shut off the cellular replication process. This article implies that there may be a risk in using older generations of stem cells in treatment, as they may become cancerous. It does not address the issue of the safety of earlier generations of stem cells, the methods of growth and replication used by the researchers, etc. The researchers themselves state that the cut off point for using stem cells should be about 60 generations to reduce the cancer risk.
Stem cell research is still in very early days, and if I had a cancer or disease which would definitely kill me, versus the risk that I may possibly develope a stem-cell induced cancer, I would still take the treatment.
2006-10-26 06:03:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by phantomlimb7 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Proliferate: "To grow or multiply by rapidly producing new tissue, parts, cells, or offspring."
Considering that blood stem cells are being used as a treatment for certain cancers, if you're refering to blood stem cells I'd say there's very little evidence to support what you've heard. The Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, for example, specializes in treating blood-borne cancers by way of stem cell transplants.
It worked for me. I'm a Hodgkin's Disease survivor who had relapsed three times. It took a stem cell transplant (using my own mother as my donor) to provide me with a lasting remission. Fingers are still crossed, but so far so good!
Now... if you're refering to embronic stem cells, I'd say what you read was sheer propoganda designed to justify a person's standpoint against it. The truth is that not enough is known about embronic stem cells (religion keeps holding research back) to make such a claim -- anymore so than it's possible to call them a treatment for anything, since little is really known about their potential. Quite the touchy issue these days!
2006-10-26 22:25:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by writersblock73 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
hmmmm ... i havent heard anything about that, but it seems that stem cells cannot proliferate cancer unless they were themselves cancer cells. because thats what stem cells do you know, proliferate themselves. maybe the cancerous cells can cause neighboring stem cells to mutate into more cancerous cells and then the cancer would be outta control. and as far as a solution, well thats our biggest problem with stem cells, we cant make them stop growing!
2006-10-26 06:00:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by etmoore108 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought the opposite was true, in fact I am pretty sure that stem cell research is being done to find ways to use stem cells to fight cancer.
2006-10-26 06:27:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by FrogDog 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm by no skill adverse to stem-cellular study so long because the cells are harvested from the umbilical cord after a stay start or from human being stem-cells. yet this study were given a nasty rep early because of a few mad scientists that would want to kill a toddler as a thanks to larger improve their technology. I in basic terms straightforward to God can't believe everyone would want to stay understanding they are alive in basic terms because an chance free toddler became made to provide up that is existence. How might want to someone stay with that comprehend-how?
2016-12-05 06:19:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by blessing 4
·
0⤊
0⤋