What does Sharia Law suggest, stoning to death?
After all they love Sharia Law.
What he forgot most was that he too is a civilian.
Every free country should watch these characters very closely.
This is the only way to protect the freedoms of all.
Strange but true.
2006-10-26 02:22:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I guess it depends on where they are making these statements. Here in the US we believe, or once believed that people had the right to speak an opinion whithout fear of reprisal. I disagree with statement made by people with an agenda to diminish other's civil rights. However, I believe with all of my heart that they have the right to say it. For me a greater concern is what do we do about politicians in office who actually remove our civil rights.
The military commissions act passed by congress (there were democrats who voted for it also) and signed by the president makes it possible to arrest a citizen, deny writ of habeous corpus, send that citizen to a foreign nation for questioning and not make the charges and evidence against that citizen available to that citizen.
For those who are conservative, keep in mind that should the government pass from conservative to liberal politicians, the law is now on the books. It could just as easily be used against you down the road as against me today. Should that happen I will still strongly argue that this is wrong.
2006-10-26 02:11:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by toff 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ignore him if you are not a Muslim. He speaks to his own community. He has the freedom of speech, guaranteed like a religious right in the West. Honour the Western traditions, formed over centuries. Do not make it an issue. The Christian clerics are no different.
2006-10-26 03:00:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by sunamwal 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Interesting question. Because we have civil rights in this country (unlike most muslim countries) we should uphold freedom of speech and let people say whatever they want. But because we have freedom of speech too, we can argue that they're wrong. We shouldn't stoop to the sort of repression that you'd find in most countries!
2006-10-26 03:58:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by trebor88 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know - the BNP speaks out against civil and human rights and protects its right to do so on the grounds of 'free speech'.
So if you punish one I guess you have to punish both.
2006-10-26 02:09:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by sarah c 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
As a muslim myself I can safely say that I shall ignore this man so hard he wouldnt remain a cleric for long ^^
2006-10-26 02:14:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think you mean "Muslim"...
And in my opinion nothing. By restricting his civil rights and freedom of speech we are lowing ourselves to his level. Lets try to educate and inform so that people stop listening to him. Taking action against him only add credibility to his argument.
2006-10-26 02:09:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by e404pnf 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Let him rant and rave until he gets full of his own importance and tries to make big headlines. He will trip himself up and end up out of this cushy country.
Just give these people enough rope, they will eventually hang themselves.
2006-10-26 02:17:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by SunGod 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Deport him back to a (medieval) Muslim country.
2006-10-26 07:59:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Discussion - debate - exchange ideas! What are your suggestions other than deporting him? kill him?
2006-10-26 02:12:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by daliaadel 5
·
2⤊
0⤋