I missed the first part of it on Tuesday. But did last nights episode, my gf saw it on Tuesday and said it was a real "sit on edge of seat" programme.
I thought it was a good effort, especially at making something different. As another poster said before, the bit in the pool was a little uncomfortable as was when he was trying to anticeptic on her arm in the bedroom.
A little bit of a silly ending. I mean surely the mad man would have killed the "good guy", instead of just knocking him out!? But apart from that a good story and unusual.
2006-10-26 00:01:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i found that if you watch the whole thing it is very slow moving. the reason holywood don't have many 3 hour films is that it requires a very strong story and great actors to carry it of. this lacked in both. i enjoyed the programme i just think that if want people o rave about a three hour programme then it needs to be the dogs kahunas.
in all i was dissapointed with all the hype.
2006-10-26 07:10:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it was kinda predictable, very good though, didnt like the "guy" in the pool with the girl, made me feel uncomfortable and I wanted to switch over. Kinda obvious when they went into the woods looking for the guy with the camper van, but I did enjoy it though.|
2006-10-26 06:54:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by jude 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saw last nights episode and was a little gutted that i missed the first one... good tv non the less...
2006-10-26 07:02:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by 007jaynesblonde 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would have been more compulsive viewing if it had have been edited by 50%
2006-10-26 07:22:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Savant 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
everyone at work was talking about it..i missed it :(
2006-10-26 06:52:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋