English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was shown an employment advertisement from 1978 for the San Francisco branch that says they are not the Federal government but private.

2006-10-25 23:35:35 · 6 answers · asked by burbank 2 in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

The Federal Reserve System is publicly owned and controlled. However there is some semblance of private ownership and influence at the Federal Reserve Branch level which would be the basis for using that term in that advertisement.

At the top of the Federal Reserve System is the Board of Governors. These are all appointed for 14-year terms by the president and confirmed by congress. It operates per it's charter and laws set by congress. it is overseen by congress. There is absolutely no structure or mechanism for private ownership at this level. (If someone disagrees, please explain how someone could take legal title to own and control the Board of Governors).

The 12 branches, however, are organized similar to private corporations. Member banks are required to buy shares in their branch. They can vote for 6 of their 9 board members. The shares get a standard 6% dividend. The shares cannot be sold on the open market. All 'profit' from the Federal Reserve branches are turned over to the Treasury at the end of the year. Whether this branch structure constitutes 'private ownership' is the subject of much debate. Even the courts have a hard time with making the distinction in related decisions. I personally equate it to contracting out. The Board of Governors has oversight and ultimate responsibility but the branch work is carried out by this contrived joint partnership arrangement of member banks.

2006-10-26 03:07:31 · answer #1 · answered by gray shadow 6 · 0 0

i think of the government is covertly being run via the banks. The banks are like a fourth branch of government. think of roughly it. The banks have been first created via Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr. Chase financial corporation which has now merged with J.P. Morgan, nevertheless operates under this is unique 1799 shape. Chase financial corporation nevertheless owns the dueling pistols used via Hamilton and Burr. The Chase financial corporation grew to become into the Rockefeller financial corporation. John D. Rockefeller, Jr. grew to become into married to Sen. Nelson Aldrich's daughter. Sen. Aldrich subsidized the law that created the federal reserve financial corporation. you are able to learn the Whitney relatives and the Payne relatives and notice the connections that they had between politics, common oil and the banking corporation. government can't perform without the banks, and the banks can't perform without the help of government. One the politicians go away workplace, they're clearly drawn to the grasping occupation of banking. examine out Prescott Bush and his relationship with Brown Brothers Harriman. take a examine out Archibald Roosevelt, son of FDR who worked on the Chase financial corporation for Rockefeller. The checklist of persons shifting from government to banking is extremely long certainly. what proportion treasury secretarys are you able to count variety that got here from the banking field and went lower back into it after leaving workplace? there's a revolving door between politics and banking it is oftentimes invisible to the widespread public. So, the place does banking end and government start up? probable the respond could be got here across on the stability sheet of the agencies of their portfolio's. If each and every of the former politicians of the previous a hundred years, their families, and their descendants had all their money tied up in J.P. Morgan Chase financial corporation/Citicorp, with the descendants of those politicians on the boards of administrators, that almost sounds like a central authority banking operation to me. there is not any wish for us, my chum.

2016-12-16 14:38:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It is a private enterprise. There is nothing "federal" about it. It is just a name to sooth peoples anxiety of a central banks. Also the regional central banks have no real power. It is also a vehicle to calm people down after three central banks before failed and took the life savings of people down with them.

The book in the link below neatly explains what is behind the banking system.

2006-10-26 00:22:27 · answer #3 · answered by The answer man 4 · 0 2

It's got to be public because is federal and it cannot be private because it has to do with reserves which are always related to the government

2006-10-26 00:20:18 · answer #4 · answered by Jose J 2 · 0 2

It is a private enterprise and something woodrow wilson regrets very much. The federal reserve as we know it was due to expire and not be allowed to have such a stranglehold on our economy, however at the last minute he extended the rights to them.
regretted.i mean.

2006-10-26 00:27:20 · answer #5 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 0 2

It is and always has been private. The name is deliberately deceptive.

2006-10-26 02:45:32 · answer #6 · answered by mikey 6 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers