English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

MM Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore reported to have siad that if US leave Iraq now, the Terriorist will think they have won, and will go on to spread their belief thru' terror.

Thus will bring the terrorism to Eroupean countries, and Asia. As they felt that they can win USSR & USA, they can now win evryone else.

What is your opinion? Should US leave Iraq?

2006-10-25 21:09:09 · 18 answers · asked by Melvin C 5 in Politics & Government Government

18 answers

We have to stay in the regions now. If we leave the terrorist would have won, and then there will be no stopping them. Islam leaders have stated that there goal is to have the entire world under the flag of Islam. Unless you have been living in a hole you have heard that. We need to stand and end this now.

2006-10-25 21:59:48 · answer #1 · answered by Joe 1 · 2 2

Mr Lee Kuan Yew has done great things for the Chinese in building a state called Singapore which he has built with the help of good fortune, the whip and carrots and America; a benign Dictatorship. Does that mean he has all the answers for the problems of this world. I think not. As far as for the US Soldiers leaving Iraq & Afghanistan or not, mate, the situation is so bad that either way the US will lose face as it already lost all credebility to be a World Leader. Thanks to your President George W Bush and his cohorts who fell asleep at the wheel. Cold war over and we won they thought. Well, Russia thought different, it was half time only for them. Sorry folks it is not over until the fat Lady sings and she even isn't on the stage as yet.

2006-10-26 00:53:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

I believe we should stay but we should change our tactics. Too many pu$$y politicians are running this war into the ground. They are too caught up with how America looks in the eyes of the rest of the world. They want America to be know as the righteous, just country. Well, we are hated by the rest of the world. So I say quit with the PC bs and unleash the true American war machine. Take our leash off and let us do what we do best and we will win this war. The world hates us already, now lets make them fear us!

2006-10-25 21:39:07 · answer #3 · answered by SGT 3 · 1 1

Terrorism has been a part,an evil part, still a part of Humanity since civilizations started. And even before that. There is no stopping a terrorist, there is no winning of a terrorist. Ask any Isreali Commander. There is hope that terrorism will wane off, and it will, but it will return again, as long as there are Religions that cannot choose a God to agree on. Or what shirt not to wear on Thursdays in October.

2006-10-25 21:22:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Sorry, but there aren't enough terrorists to conquer all of Europe & Asia. A VERY small percentage of those in the Middle East are Islamic Extremeists.

Even most of those you hear about in Iraq are just people who want the U.S. out of Iraq. There's no way they'll be able to physically dominate the world.

Yes, I do believe that we should leave Iraq. We can't hold their hand forever. We have to let them build their own country, that way, they'll respect it better.

2006-10-25 21:14:16 · answer #5 · answered by amg503 7 · 1 1

The U.S. soldiers are not trained in diplomacy, they are trained to kill. Their presence is causing more chaos in Iraq and they are being killed at an astonishing rate. The administration is incompetent and has put the soldiers in harms way without properly preparing them for this war. The U.S. soldiers should be pulled out within six months if not sooner. The only ones benefitting are Haliburton, Dick Cheney's company, and a few others like KBR. They are fraudulently overbilling the U.S. government and contributing to the massive defecit. It must stop.

2006-10-25 21:23:31 · answer #6 · answered by Lagunacarrie 1 · 3 1

No, it quite is a few thing that happens quite clearly to all infantrymen from all international locations while they conflict against somebody. it is an exceedingly ordinary reaction formation the place you're combating against some team of people and could grant your self with justification for combating against them. conflict itself trains people to be racist. infantrymen are no longer taught this in guidance; they're taught "you haven't any longer have been given any loose will to make any judgements; you presently have a great commanding officer who will fill this function for you." ideally, this might serve to decrease the unlucky cruelty which you have defined (in actuality protecting the underlying racism it quite is particular to enhance and combating too many overt reflects). be conscious how extraordinarily much each and all the examples you will locate are the consequence of a soldier's very own decision in keeping together with his/their very own emotions- no longer on the orders of a great. you will could seek extraordinarily complicated to locate even one occasion of a great who orders his adult males to do some thing like this. I project you to find 5 such examples. i've got self belief you are able to desire to do it, yet alongside the way you will locate a minimum of 20 of the different style for each a million of those. it quite is the long answer. the fast answer isn't any, we are no longer taught this in guidance. As for notwithstanding if or no longer there's a huge element of people who hate Muslims...it relies upon how large you're finding for and what diploma of hatred isn't elementary. a sturdy pal of mine is a refugee from Iraq, and he's informed me approximately people who tease him for his meals recurring, act fearful around him, or come to a decision they do no longer want to spend time with him while they locate out he's Iraqi. i might say there is quite some room for progression, and there is easily a huge variety of people who do no longer regard Iraqis and Muslims greater often than no longer as they could. There are some people who right now up hate Muslims, or perhaps nevertheless they're extraordinarily noticeable, i does no longer call it a huge selection. in spite of this, issues are no longer as they could be.

2016-10-16 10:25:44 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Whatever happens, there will still be terrorism, Staying in Iraq and Afghanistan will not stop, nor reduce, terrorism. Leaving will not stop, nor reduce, terrorism. so if wither way you look at it, there will still be terrorism, why are we still there?

How do I know there will still be terrorism? because mush of the terrorism is a ruse by the security services to manipulate populations

Google P2OG and the hegalian dialectic, or "Problem, Reaction, Solution"

2006-10-25 21:28:44 · answer #8 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 0 2

Lets put this question in this way:why USA sould stay in Irak and Afghanistan?,yes,why?
Staying would only make grow terror...,right?so...,if USA leaves would stop terror...,right?(time to think:stop terror=not killing terror)
When you leave Irak and Afghanistan actually you get the first advantage to fix things,unless that you want to fix things by unknowledge(haha,thats very possible),which preatty much is the republican mentality.
Now...the terrorism is not about third world countries my friends...,why?(haha),because only the powers give"em the weapons,so maybe China,Russia grow terrorism,yes...,maybe,so lets be friends from them or make bussiness.

Getting back to the question:why USA should live Irak and Aghanistan?

Because Irak and Aghanistan are the wrong targets about terror war.

2006-10-25 23:16:41 · answer #9 · answered by whatever 3 · 0 2

No never.
The USA needs a hardened base in Iraq to keep an eye on Iran's activities.

2006-10-25 21:18:20 · answer #10 · answered by Red 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers