that when he suceeds to the Throne, he wants 2 coronation ceremonies. The first will be a Christian ceremony and the 2nd is to be a Multifaith ceremony. This is a change of centuries of tradition. Do you think he should do this, or is it another case of Political Correctness going too far?
2006-10-25 21:03:18 · 30 answers · asked by researcher 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Well he can't win either way can he? Frankly if he becomes king one day [and there have been concerns over his health for a long time] I do not believe there should be two coronations. I am a monarchist because I haven't seen a good example of any alternative yet - anywhere in the World.
Charles is a visionary and an original thinker - and often he is right about controversial issues, but I do not believe he should take away from the indigenous population their right to have a traditional coronation.
It is doubtful that the Islamic fundamentalists and their home grown terrorists will be interested anyway, they will be too busy plotting disruption for such an event.
- and for Charles to get the mass support of the indigenous population for his coronation he is going to have to show them his support. He is still viewed through the 'soap eyes' of the late Diana 'followers' judging by all the spiteful and bitchy comments you read about his wife, and that minority group seem to get plenty of publicity from the media.
I believe that one traditional coronation with representatives from all faiths around the world is what is called for now - particularly as 'integration' is the flavour of the day!
I think he has made a big mistake, I think he will damage the Church of England's membership and I do not believe he should have got on board 'the veil of anonymity' train!
Sorry Your Royal Highness - first time you've crossed me!!!!
2006-10-26 00:59:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Prince Charles has always made it clear that if he ever becomes king, he wants the title of "defender of the faiths" not "faith". He is a well meaning and sensitive person, and I am sure that his motives are honourable. However, I think that he has lost the plot a little bit, because the Monarch succeeds to the throne on the basis that they (as in the Royal we) will defend the faith of the country. This is part of the constitution. As the faith of the country is Christian and has been, ever since (and before) the first overall king of Saxon England around the 8th Century, he cannot change this without a constitutional change. The vast majority of the true English population of the country (whether Christian or atheist) would be utterly and violently opposed to this change. This is because it would be the first real step in the anti Christian and anti English take over of the country by immigrant bloodsuckers of predominantly Muslim, but also of many other faiths. Charles must understand that his duty as monarch will be to protect and defend England, its traditions and customs and its Christian faith. If he wants to go ahead with his well meaning but misguided nonsense, then he must be made to abdicate.
KEEP ENGLAND ESSENTIALLY ENGLISH!
2006-10-26 06:28:34 · answer #2 · answered by tony_de2003 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sounds strange coming from a country which has an official religion. You think he'd rather save the taxpayers money, and only have one ceremony; I'm sure you guys would like that even better.
2006-10-26 04:08:34 · answer #3 · answered by amg503 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This adulterer and fornicator will never have my respect as King whatever he does. How he can be head of the church and other religions after his breaking the holy vows of marriage beggers belief. Perhaps he is looking for a faith that allows such behaviour. He should never ever succeed to the throne.
2006-10-26 05:09:07 · answer #4 · answered by Tallboy 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it is going too far, he will be King of England, head of the Church of England. This should be a christian event. Sorry if the other faiths object, but too bad. You don't see multifaith event at important Royal occassions in the middle east, or other nations with Royalty, so i don't see why we should have them either.
Wise up Charles, this is not good for your image!
2006-10-26 04:09:08 · answer #5 · answered by Lynn S 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Sounds like wishful thinking unless I've just missed the Queen's retirement announcement.
(Actually he probably fancies the multifaith ceremony 'cos it would be loads more fun and feels he has to do the Christian one to keep the nobs happy.)
2006-10-26 04:06:10 · answer #6 · answered by crosbie 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes he is going too far he should be speaking out about how multiculturalism has detryoed this country, if he became king he would be defender of the faith, i still believe in the monarchy but this royal family have let the country down in a big way
2006-10-26 04:23:23 · answer #7 · answered by covleg 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I didn't hear the news, so I don't know his reasons. I think it is unnecessary and wonder why he wants to do it. He's obviously not terribly religious - his lifestyle has shown us that. So I think it is hypocritical. He's not a very good advocate for the Church of England, never mind any other faiths.
Is he trying to say: I am the king of the Muslims, the Jews, the Catholics, the Jehovah's Witnesses? Do we have a choice?
2006-10-26 04:09:43 · answer #8 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
what do you expect from a wiener who has lived in style and litterally born with a silver spoon in his mouth, he is playing for the winning side so he can maintain his style of life when the Muslim's take over, in other words he see's the hand writing on the wall, and he will also convert to Islam , what the hell has happened to the white christian race that they have lost their will to make a stand for what is right or are they so stupid they think being political correct is the ultimate
2006-10-26 04:17:41 · answer #9 · answered by jim ex marine offi, 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I have a feeling that the queen is going to outlive Prince Charles and maybe that's a good thing.
2006-10-26 04:06:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋