English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does anyone else, besides me, think they should have more title belts in ECW to make it more entertaining? I think they should bring back the Television Title, the Tag Team Title's, and have an Extreme Hardcore Champion Title as well. What do you think?

2006-10-25 19:02:19 · 10 answers · asked by Thomas C 4 in Sports Wrestling

10 answers

Even though WWE's version of ECW wont be as good as the old school ECW, they should bring back more of the old school stuff as much as they can. If ECW expects to do nearly half as good as Smackdown! or RAW, then they should bring back at least 2 more titles and get rid of the "non hardcore" matches they have. ECW is all about hardcore, you can have any non hardcore matches. They need to do all they can to push this one hour show into a great one hour total hardcore crazyness. Even though theyre on for only an hour, great wrestling programs like TNA have 3 titles and have been on the air for only an hour. If anything they should bring at least the Tag Team titles, it like to see some hardcore tag team action. That would up the ratings really well. About the TV Title and the Extreme Hardcore Champion I only think the Extreme Hardcore Champion Title is a good idea. The other TV Title might not be coming back, I just dont see WWE going in that direction. But yes, ECW should bring more titles.

2006-10-25 19:52:35 · answer #1 · answered by iRob 3 · 0 0

The Tag Team titles should return.

2006-10-25 19:59:01 · answer #2 · answered by dumitriu_radu2003 2 · 0 0

ECW could never be as good as the former, and even if they did bring back more of the titles you would still feel a loss. Although it might make it a bit more interesting, it wouldn't completely alter how most people feel about it.

2006-10-25 19:11:08 · answer #3 · answered by "Teh" Leester 3 · 0 0

I think they should at the least definitely bring back the Tag Titles so people like Tommy Dreamer and Sandman/ Test and Mike Knox can be fighting for more than just to win a fight.

2006-10-25 19:05:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I like the Hardcore Champion

2006-10-25 19:35:35 · answer #5 · answered by Jeffito 5 · 0 0

Yea,they should.I think Rhyno burned the ECW Televison Title.

2006-10-25 19:52:03 · answer #6 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 0 0

The problem with ECW is that they don't have enough quality wrestlers. So bringing titles and letting incompetent wrestlers champion would not make it a bigger show than RAW AND SMACKDOWN.

2006-10-25 19:10:55 · answer #7 · answered by truth 3 · 0 0

I could accept as true with you. What they do now's so crammed in to a minimum of one prepare in the hour and it is often complicated to observe. while it first began with RVD, large prepare, Sabu, and names like that, a 2d identify for the mid card could have been a large thought yet now their are not any suitable point adult males. it is sparkling that they dont think of Punk is worth anymore. yet now with their roster, one belt is acceptable for them. A tag team identify on there may be a cluster on condition that there isn't any emphasis on the tag team wrestling like there as quickly as became. I recommend the hot Breed/Originals became dropped so quickly it became like uhhh, what befell. in the event that they flow 2 hours, deliver a television identify returned and make it recommend some thing. supply it to Burke and enable him run with it on condition that they gained't supply him the ECW identify and he can attempt against and communicate, thats the sorrowful area approximately.

2016-10-16 10:22:30 · answer #8 · answered by quinteros 4 · 0 0

yeah this ECW can never b as good as the old one.
This ECW is new and r developing new talents.When it will gain more popularity and when its base will become stronger new championships will b introduced.That's for sure.

2006-10-25 19:39:46 · answer #9 · answered by trevor 1 · 0 0

Don't give mcmahon any ideas.

2006-10-25 19:13:18 · answer #10 · answered by howard the duq 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers