do you think he did this just to get a military foot hold in the middle east? I think we should charge him with treason do you?
2006-10-25 18:31:53 · 29 answers · asked by I hate texans they are all f*cks 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Almost assuredly, his dad and their pals did it. Greed, ideology both politically and religiously made 3000 people expendible.
2006-10-25 18:35:55 · answer #1 · answered by Legandivori 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I think Yale's skull n' bones fraternity of powerful lifelong members had him set it up and put an arab face on it so that he could focus all the built up hate of the American people towards his enemy "Saddam Hussein" and get his oil. If we're kickin' but over in Iraq how come the gas prices aren't, say, $0.15 now anyway? Smells like price gouchin' greed to me... People are unified through hatred, think about it, but hate is a dumb emotion; and now that the hatred has died down we all think going to war in Iraq is stupid now and we want our soldiers back home. All the while the real culprit (triggerman) Osama bin Laden is still out there and I bet he's on Bush's yahoo buddylist.
I ain't got anything against Texas at all. My favorite musical artists are from there. I'm not a democrat neither because they're just blue collared republicans. But I know John Kerry and Bush both are members of the skull n' bones fraternity and it wouldn't have mattered who won because whoever was to win would have been their puppet.
Bush's brother, who's the governor of Florida did disenfranchize black voters in order to help his brother win the presidential election. I'm pretty sure he'll be president some time in the future too...
2006-10-25 18:57:50 · answer #2 · answered by nowlatagataz 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, it's not a 'conspiracy'.
With 9/11, the president and the cabinet went to the drawing board with the new world that we live in now. With this new information that we're actually in a war, (and the USA is the last to know about), -we re-thought our enemies and potential enemies, and those with outstanding UN sanctions in violation.
Iraq jumped out of this list, - as an accident waiting to happen. Now should we wait around, and shut down our borders, close our curtains and wait for the next dirty-bomb attack? Me and alot of other didn't think so. Even the demo's rallied behind the president since everyone KNEW Saddam had WMDs.
Now that it's been a few years, we know the US has made mistakes. But with that in mind we know the dems would have made BIGGER mistakes.
Thank B. Clinton for treating the bombings in the 90's as a police action rather than an act-of-war.
2006-10-25 18:39:09 · answer #3 · answered by MK6 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You need to let go of the hate. There are good and bad Texans,
just like any other place. I don't think he did, nor would any other
US politician, I would hope, regardless of which party they belong to.
That would amount to treason. If someone did something like, that
person should get the same penalty as Timothy McVeigh did, which was the death penalty. He was responsible for the Oklahoma City
bombings, along with Terry Nichols. Terry Nichols didn't get executed, but I think he is just as guilty as McVeigh in my book, and deserves the same fate.
2006-10-25 18:39:47 · answer #4 · answered by Answerer17 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
There is absolutely no evidence or possible reason for the accusation of President Bush in the World Trade Center Attack. Although it is good to keep the powers of government in check it is ludicrous to think that they would attack their own people. And if there was the slightest of evidence I am sure it would have been found and displayed in some kind of spectacle to get you to watch the news.
2006-10-25 18:38:11 · answer #5 · answered by rchlndstwdnt 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Know I don't think he set up the attacks. He was expecting attacks from the outside not from inside the country. We have awesome technology we for got the importance of human communication that's ware it all went wrong.
2006-10-25 18:47:41 · answer #6 · answered by David M 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's crazy to think that.
Why would he do that to his own country?
Plus, as your name says it seems you're having problems with Texans, which are Americans.
Terrorist attacks happens all over the world. If what you say is true, does it means that he spends so much money just to terrorise other countries?
2006-10-25 18:58:49 · answer #7 · answered by prickleypickle 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I do not agree with George Bush's policy but that does not means that I will arbitrary believe he did such a hideous thing, to start a war. I do think that his government took the opportunity while in Afghanistan to "invent" Irak.
2006-10-25 18:38:28 · answer #8 · answered by SEG48 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nope. But the Republicans blame everything on Bill Clinton though.
2006-10-25 20:49:27 · answer #9 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know.
We will never know.
Is he capable of it? Yep.
Is it dangerous to be talking about it? Yep.
Some people formerly in the CIA have hinted that the attack was done with complicity of people in the U.S. and that we would recognize their names. That is as far as they will go.
I'm surprised so many people think G.W.B. is a Texan. He was born and bred in Connecticut. Took him months to learn to fake the accent.
2006-10-25 18:49:26 · answer #10 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am trying to figure this out right now,,, I definitly think he knew the attacks were going to happen,, at the very least...He couldnt have actually set it up cause he is too stupid,, his cabnet however , could have..
Many texans are good folks, and millions of them voted AGAINST bush
2006-10-25 18:36:48 · answer #11 · answered by jr 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋