only if they are ugly
2006-10-25 17:08:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Illegal???come on!!A sinful condom??? So instead you would rather the adoption rate to sky rocket or heavans to betsy ABORTION sky rocket!??!? If you get angry everytime you see a condom i think you might have some issues you need to work out. Condoms are a great invention...you can have all the sex you want with your spouse (which by the way god invented) and not over populate our world at the same time!
2006-10-25 17:21:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you going to burn me at the stake for using contraception?
If I had used a condom - I wouldn't pay $300 in support for a child that I rarely see.
Becuase I didn't use a condom - I've accepted responsibility.
If I decide to have sex with my wife, I will accept responsibility for another child. If I don't want that responsibility, I will wear a condom or ask my wife for reassurance that she isn't ovulating. That is between my wife and me - not anyone else.
So, do you still want to burn me at the stake?
2006-10-25 17:13:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everyone who isn't ready to have a child should use contraception regardless if you're married or not. It's not fair to bring a child into this world when the parents aren't ready. Not all married couples want children or are ready to be parents.
2006-10-25 17:09:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, considering that most of the people in this country are retarded, most married couples should use contraception to prevent the birth of more retarded people, thereby increasing the intelligence level of the American gene pool. But unfortunately, they don't. Stupid people procreate like friggin rabbits, which is why we're up to our eyebrows in mental deficients.
2006-10-25 17:10:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
But you think it's ok to have more children than you can afford to care for, right? Yeah, that makes sense. Not to mention that the rest of us taxpayers should be responsible for their financial needs....and of course, most of all, it doesn't matter that those children will most likely not be given the nurturing, loving home they deserve because their parents are overwhelmed and didn't really want them in the first place. Gotcha....
Sorry man, long live birth control!!!!
2006-10-25 17:11:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by freyas_kin28 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
nothing wrong with them using contraception - some couples like to put off having kids or they may want to have a few years between having kids.... as long as they both are in agreement with making those kind of plans and understanding that it can fail.
2006-10-25 17:13:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by jaimestar64cross 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was a volunteer at a pregnancy center- a married woman came in and we tested her - and she was pregnant- she said she could not carry the baby because of her health- she aborted her baby- she is also a member of a local catholic church-I was so miffed!!should she have used contraception??? or murder?? D
2006-10-25 17:12:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Debby B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just because someone is married, doesn't mean they are ready to have children. I had rather see someone use a contraceptive than see them abort an unwanted pregnancy.....
2006-10-25 17:09:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by YellaMelaDude 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Um..YEAH! Unless you think the world needs to completely overpopulated with familes of 15 and 20 children... Maybe we could infuse the world with a few million more mouths to feed...
2006-10-25 17:09:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by missapparition 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If a couple does not want kids right now I feel they should use some type of protection. Married or not.
2006-10-25 18:42:28
·
answer #11
·
answered by Joystick 2
·
0⤊
0⤋