Michael Myers heard "the voice of Samhain" which told him to kill his sisters. The same voice was in Michael Myers grandfather's head as well. It supposedly skips every other generation. In Halloween III: SOTW the concept is to have that 'voice' materialize into a 'person'. This person being Col. Cochran, who runs Silver Shamrock. He is the persona of the voice of Samhain. He's the one who told Michael Myers to kill. THAT my friends is how it's tied in together. The original idea, after Part 2, was to make a new Halloween movie every year that would be different, tied only together by Samhain, the Festivale of The Dead. You can check out what I've said by reading the first 3 Halloween books.... :-) Also, before H4:The Return of Michael Myers, I'd written my own short-story called 'Halloween: A Letter From The Dead' which was published in a local magazine called 'Exit Zero' in the 80s ;-)
2006-10-25 17:54:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Army Of Machines (Wi-Semper-Fi)! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Halloween 3 was when Michael Myers went on vacation! LOL. I can't believe that I'm admitting to this, but I do own it! It has absolutely nothing to do with Michael or the story line. I guess they must have run out of a story line and it took them until Halloween 4 to come up with another story. Who knows.
2006-10-25 16:43:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dorah C 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
At the time, it was intended to drop the Michael Meyers storyline (burning him to "death" at the end of Halloween II). The studio's big idea was to then release a new spooky movie, with different stories, each Halloween under the "Halloween" moniker. Well, their first attempt sank that idea like a stone and Micheal Meyers was quickly dusted off and put back into action.
2006-10-25 16:41:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lost Panda 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It makes not a stinkin' lick of sense.
I have seen a lot of pointless films, but this is a leader.
It might as well have been called "Halloween Three: Electric Boogaloo"
2006-10-25 16:26:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I feel it was just something to get through to the next movie in the series. They could have done something alot better. Maybe a prequel.
2006-10-25 16:34:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by sometimes I'm too nice 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
it does not ....the production company that owned the rights to the name thought that the audience did not want to see Micheal so they out that piece of crap out...and when it bombed they went back to Micheal..... but the movies still don't fully follow like they re suppose to!...or rather h20 dose not!
2006-10-25 16:31:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by crissymm5 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Even though this question has been asked quite afew times(and no one bothers to search) It has nothing to do with Michael Myers storyline.
2006-10-25 16:27:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I consider each and every physique else...flow and see yet another well-being care expert and get a 2d opinion and yet another blood try. yet bear in mind, regardless of the undeniable fact that very uncommon, it may additionally be a phantom being pregnant OR an ectopic being pregnant. Phantom pregnancies happen once you strongly have self assurance which you're pregnant lots so as which you trick your physique into producing being pregnant indications. An ectopic being pregnant is whilst the toddler implants exterior of the uterus interior the ovaries or fallopian tube and could be fairly risky! good luck :)
2016-11-25 21:05:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It doesn't. It has nothing to do with the whole story.
2006-10-25 22:32:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by John71 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nope. It wasn't supposed to when it came out. ; )
2006-10-25 16:48:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chistiaŋ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋