scared it could hurt her career if she did and lost?
2006-10-25 15:05:15 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
elpibe - If you are referring to the first question mark, that is put there by Yahoo! automatically. Thanks for playing!!!
2006-10-25 16:25:22 · update #1
YES, because there is absolutely No impeachable offense
done by President Bush!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-10-25 15:09:50 · answer #1 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush will have 2 years left after this election. Americans, at least us old people, remember how awful Watergate was, and have no interest in going thru it again, especially for a guy who's a lame duck and a goner in 2 years.
She won't get the case thru the Senate even if she gets it thru the House. The Senate, in the best case scenario for the Dems, will only have a 2 vote margin if they're in control, and that's not enough to carry an impeachment vote (as we found out with Clinton).
So, why do it if it has a huge potential downside, and there isn't any chance of it happeneing? The left crazies will always vote for her, she won't ever pick up any votes from the right, so what would she gain?
2006-10-25 15:11:29 · answer #2 · answered by geek49203 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Don't bail him out.
Make him deal with the mess he's created. He was elected after all. Now, wasn't he?
Don't impeach a president who's only doing things the way you already knew he was going to approach it all. You vote for four years. Don't impeach. Just vote smarter next time.
You get what you vote for. That goes for democratic wins too.
2006-10-25 15:13:49 · answer #3 · answered by roostershine 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the sole conceivable rationalization is that she is attentive to widespread Democrats who're complicit in BushCo's unlawful activities, so which you ought to start impeachment courtroom circumstances might actually convey down the completed government. are you able to think of what might happen if Bush and his cronies, alongside with 10 or 20 or 30 Representatives and Senators have been all implicated in crime? the rustic might careen into chaos. I agree that Pelosi ought to be impeached for failing to do her accountability. for people who think of "he's long previous quickly, why difficulty", the respond is easy. the line might desire to be drawn. Justice might desire to be served. we can't enable a President to flee with severe crimes against the form, and we can't enable Congress to allow the President to achieve this. yet i think of the undeniable fact that Bush would be long previous works to our benefit. in keeping with possibility he won't be "impeached", despite the fact that it extremely is sparkling this u . s . desires and merits an autonomous examine to convey his crimes to mild. united statesa. merits the fact of what has been executed in our call.
2016-11-25 20:57:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Impeachment is a waste of time, plus then we'd have Preside tn Cheney.
2006-10-25 15:36:24 · answer #5 · answered by arvis3 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She is never going to be in a position to impeach. Plus there is no reason.
2006-10-25 15:08:57 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Impeach on what grounds?
2006-10-25 15:07:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
somebody needs to stop worrying about Pelosi and instead take a grammar/writing class at a local university!!!!!
2006-10-25 15:14:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
She is the one that said Bush did it and everyone knows it about
9/11, But if we tell the people they will lynch us all. Beleive?
2006-10-25 15:11:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
SHE IS NOT WORRIED... SHE'S GOT A JOB TO DO AND SHE WILL...
IF ONE IS NOT GUILTY OF ANY WRONG DOING DOES ONE HAVE TO BE WORRIED ABOUT IMPEACHMENT OR CONGRESSIONAL HEARING?
2006-10-25 15:07:09 · answer #10 · answered by cork 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋