Do you think that the USA will win the war on Terror>?

Answer 1

They didn't think they would stop the terrorist in Germany after WWII. The Americans executed nearly a thousand and imprisoned thousands more. The British executed thousands and the Russians executed tens of thousands. Most people in the world thought the Germans were too barbaric to ever stop, but they did. They did when they finally figured out they were destroying their own country and its infrastructure.

The Iraqis are no different today. One day soon they will realize they have discovered who the true enemy is and that it is themselves, and that is when the war in Iraq will be over—with or without the United States Army being there.

Answer 2

The "war on terror" is an unwinnable proposition. You don't make war on a verb! Terrorism is an attitude, not a definable, pinpointable enemy. It's like saying you're going to make war on curiosity or on envy or on femininity. It's like making war on the concept of being dog! Further, whenever it appears that the Administration's behavior in Iraq and Afganistan is blowing up in their faces yet again, they keep revising the definition of the war. We didn't win the war against Nazi Germany by attacking bremmstralung! We won it by attacking German panzers and disabling German heavy industry.

Answer 3

The more advanced countries just invent their own terror and then identify it where they want it to be, so they can then attack to achieve their agendas.

You cant fight terror it is an idea "the war on terror" is just buzz words to keep the sheeples happy at home and not thinking too much.

http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=9381
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bush_laden_network.htm
http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0638,fiore,74465,9.html

have a read get informed or just go back to the tv...most do anyway.

Answer 4

No. But I do think we will become isolationists. There is really almost nothing we need to import, including oil, if we'd just make some adjustments to the way we live. When we make those changes we can say "Screw all of you" to the rest of the world. That's when terror will fade away from us.

Answer 5

Quite simply...

No.

I wouldn't use the term 'win' at all because that would imply that they actually gained something when in reality, they have lost lives and money. I don't know what term i would use. But it's defenitely not 'win'. I guess it's just another successful invasion... But even that use of wording sucks.

The amount of lives lost on both fronts has been incredible. So there is no winning. Just a resting period between battles.

Answer 6

it extremely is embarassing that persons no longer purely don't be attentive to history, yet certainly fail to understand the character of the allied attempt, which went a strategies previous direct militia involvement. a super form of people (and others) died merely attempting to deliver issues around the Atlantic to help the British attempt. interior the early tiers of the war, Britain, France, Holland, Belgium, eire, and distinctive different international locations have been allied against Germany; the British having a super naval fleet. With a predominantly land-based war in Europe, such naval stress became no longer extraordinarily smart, till it handed off to be utilized in particular factors, or for the circulate of troops and munitions. The p.c.. of the German war-device became such that no different u . s . ought to equipment-up so on the instant, and convey what became had to counter-attack, and in that, the British goverment had thoroughly did no longer understand or prepare for the Nazi threat. without American help, the place do human beings think of that the hardware might have come from? whilst human beings gloat over the effectiveness of the RAF interior the Batle of england, in keeping with possibility they might desire to bear in mind that Rolls-Royce engines have been being made on the Packard production facility in united statesa., and shipped over, mutually as the German U-boat instructions picked them off and sank the ships. by the war, there became a persevering with substitute of tips and technological know-how, between depended on allies and "the particular dating." it ought to convey human beings to their senses if war have been to be declared against England back, using fact they might then know the cost of that "particular dating" and the sacrifice that a super form of made. i'm afraid that once you have seen brave previous adult males cry over the suggestions of lost family contributors,pals and comrades, as they walk between the masses of thousands of war-graves in Europe, or witnessed the silent bitter dignity of an previous Polish lady who lost her finished family contributors in a concentratuon camp, you do no longer locate those style of teenage questions relaxing. united statesa. is not greater Hollywood than England is Pinewood Studios. i think of that's time the questioner grew up, and tutor that he's 0.5 brave as his grandparents have been.

Answer 7

No I do not, we are too far behind, and we have no clear direction, and you have to remember that our government such as it is supplies these foriegn countrys with supplies as well as technology. I believe and have heard from several sources that if we ever do go to war, it will be with China, and China is very technology in the know...

Answer 8

Sure, the same way the US won the War on Poverty, and won the War on Drugs. Yep, I have total faith in our ability to win this one.

Answer 9

Reps are only aggressive that's why they think they can win the war. they only think about spending taxpayer's money and Democrats will find ways on how to handle this war

Answer 10

Terror is a tactic, not an enemy. It's been around as long as time and will always exist.