2006-10-25 13:53:12 · 6 answers · asked by crystal 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
good and bad for the kid. i mean, he'll be rich and famous for a while. bad cuz, he is young and in a few years prolly wont remember his family and his siblings died.
2006-10-25 13:58:12 · answer #1 · answered by abbalicious 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well she sure getting press coverage in the UK since this adoption. Some are saying if she got that much money why didn't she sponsor the little boy family. Instead for taking him away from his father. Another story is that so called Hollywood stars think they can buy people. She even bought the chid a £21.000 toy car for him when she landed in London.
2006-10-25 14:17:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
With all of the controversy, why didn't she just adopt one of the thousands that are in the US? I can't believe how many of these entertainers don't even try to give back to the community by taking these children out of the "system."
2006-10-25 14:37:44 · answer #3 · answered by LA Law 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm wondering why so many celebrities feel the need to adopt children outside of the US when there are many here needing a home.
2006-10-25 13:58:18 · answer #4 · answered by FlrBeachGirl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I took my daughter for a walk in her stroller. She became 3 months previous, i think of. besides, it became like 89 ranges exterior. i ended right into a mcdonald's interior sight to get myself some water. some previous lady interior became asserting back and back back how i wanted some outfits on that toddler. (She became merely in her diaper, what with it being 89 ranges and all). She became telling me that infants get colds so actual and she or he desires purely a shirt or something! Ugh!
2016-11-25 20:52:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably will be raised by a nanny.
2006-10-25 13:55:07 · answer #6 · answered by Unshaken Faith 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋