How much faster is a P4 3.0G 800MHz 1MB cache to a Celeron D 2.8G 256kb cache 533mhz. Is it worth changing?

Answer 1

a P-4 is much better in data transfer while gaming,, than a celeron d,,, celeron d's are great overclocking chips, but lag during bigtime gaming,, us an amd or dual core for super hardcore gaming,, celeron d's are fairly inexpensive and if you dont need to game its perfectly fine,, no need to spend and extra 75-100 bucks just for a 30% speed upgrade,, cuz its about 100% cost increase,, you could over clock that cel d probably in the range of 3.2 ghz and still have good cpu temp,,, stick w/ what you have,,,

Answer 2

You will notice an increase, nothing major, but then again that P4 you are talking about can't be that expensive so it might be worth it. Just make sure though that your motherboard will support an 800MHz bus, because right now you only have a 533 and their is a chance that your motherboard might not support a bigger bus speed.

Answer 3

Is the price difference worth the gain in speed? That Celeron D will run most anything that's out there game wise.

Answer 4

hi, the respond in my view is with out doubte the Intel CPU with a million.6Hrtz clock velocity and 1MB onboard cache. Why? through fact the intel CPU is able to cache documents right into a 1Meg onboard cache which provides the finished factor approximately being waiting to technique training plenty greater at as quickly as than the AMD processor which has a smaller onboard cache and so woudnt be waiting to technique training as quickly. Which additionally potential that the Intel processor in all likelihood outputs training greater at as quickly as too. **word: The CPU clock velocity or the quantity of onboard cache the chip has is barely one component in a machines overall performance or responsiveness. the two significant & some IT human beings might say greater significant is the fee (in Htrz) of your machines close by bus or front facet bus. Its what connects each and all the distinctive factors of the equipment mutually and so whether you have the quickest CPU with a large cache its in easy terms as stable through fact the fee of the close by bus. **to illustrate If the fee of the close by bus is barely 400Hrtz then even in the adventure that your CPU is 3.0 giga hrtz you in all likelihood wont get the entire advantages of the processor through fact its the close by bus that governs how briskly something of the equipment can respond. **in different words once you purchase a equipment make certain you recognize ways briskly the close by bus is, its the close by bus thats greater significant than in easy terms CPU clock velocity or volume of cache, or volume of equipment reminiscence (returned velocity of reminiscence too is significant). IR

Answer 5

for everyday tasks like surfing and word processing you wont notice much differrence ... if ur doing processor intensive tasks like video converting you will notice a pretty good increase ... maybe a difference between 1 hour to convert a movie to 35 minuets ... if you really want to do an upgrade you will notice get a dual-core processor some fast harddrives in raid and 2 gigs of fast ram ...

Answer 6

celerons are cheap and poor overclockers but if its dual core and has a decent clock speed which yours does i wouldnt spend the cash required for a p4/.... your cache though sucks you can update that and i recomend doing so

Answer 7

I would get a dual core to see a real increase.
What you describe isn't a big step up.

Answer 8

No. If you change, go AMD. All intels are the same.