True
there must be war for peace
as sure as there must be darkness for light
2006-10-25 11:40:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Xae 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
False
2006-10-25 11:40:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by debralizjr 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
ABSOLUTELY FALSE.
Need explanations?
1st Logically it's impossible, coz it doesn't contemplate the fact that for a war to exist it has to be a broken peace... therefor it was a peace before, huh? so, if peace was already there, it's possible to have peace w/out a war.
2nd- C¿mon guys who needs a dead relative?
3rd- war is the solituon of the weak and the ignorant
2006-10-25 14:04:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by colodoco's 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
its true yet false at the very same time. we must first question what is peace? no violence, am i correct? all is good? harmony perhaps?
so what on earth does war do? everything that peace is not.
but then again, how do you achieve this "peace" that we're talking about? it surely ain't going to happen naturally, at the rate we're going at.
so with that said, peace is nothing but an imaginary thought. it's an illusion that we will never reach because mankind is too selfish to all be in harmony.
2006-10-25 13:22:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did humanity begin with a war?
Were the first people brought into existence while they were at war with another?
I think not.
It only makes sense that were was a time, it doesn't matter how brief, when there was no war. Therefore peace naturally exists without war.
2006-10-25 12:09:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by mtm180 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are situations that require stress. such using fact the invasion of Germany for the period of the 2d international war. Hitler had to occupy the international and rule as a god - now that became a madman that had to be bumped off via stress. All available associates of Germany in Europe including united statesa. fought a heroic war and liberated the international from actual terrorism. I come from Malawi, an African u . s .. It became colonized via the British and became stated as Nyansaland. We gained independence in 1964, without war or conflict. The Malawi leaders merely sat down with the British leaders and suggested the project to reply to your question. No. war isn't needed if there are different strategies.
2016-11-25 20:39:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i've never had a war and i have peace.
You may just be asking the silly rabbits, in which case, never mind - I am quite a serious rabbit.
2006-10-25 11:49:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by solita 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nope-violence is not the answer. I don't think we'll ever have world peace b/c every culture and every country and every person has their own way of life/living. Not everyone is going to just wake up and change who they are or the their living environment. Going to war isn't going to solve anything, it just kills humans and the earth. War only proves who has a stronger army-Very Immature. When you have kids, are you going to teach them that if they beat someone up they're going to get their way...no? MAKE LOVE NOT WAR!
2006-10-25 11:46:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by cjb 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
So following your logic to its absurd conclusion, we may only conclude that perpetual peace will only happen once we have perpetual war, or that there needs to be a war in order for there to be peace. Sounds silly.
2006-10-25 11:51:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
True...if everyone was good, then no one would know what evil was..
if there never was a war, the word peace prolly wouldnt have even been invented. in caveman days, ppl were naiive about peace because it just "was". then someone prolly got angry and started a "war". then everyone realised how bad this "war" thing sucked for everyone so they thought..."i wish we had that un-war-like-thingy again" so somewhere, there was a need for this word. and need is the mother of invention.
2006-10-25 11:50:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by normal_cody 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
False.
2006-10-25 12:08:25
·
answer #11
·
answered by Maus 7
·
0⤊
0⤋