are these good points? [a is smart, b is not, but a doesnt deserve more]?

Question

b can grow 5b [=5 bushels] on own, a can grow 10b on own, a+b can grow 30b - therefore a & b shd get 15 each? [assuming equal hrs of work, including a's time reading studying thinking experimenting] [or, put another way, just division is in proportion to workhour shares]
workTIME is the only thing that is paid IN JUSTICE [= peace democracy liberty law order nonextinction]? because the only PERSONAL LOSS is time [the energy loss difference wd be insignificant, a tspn of glucose - mental work uses ?more energy]
the smarts [gift of nature] are not IN JUSTICE to be paid for - because they are not any PERSONAL LOSS - the fact that, when mother nature peppers humanity with smarts, more land on a's head than on b's head, is nothing to do with payrights - reward a, for something nature did? no
is this not the meaning of equality? unequal gifts, equal payrights?
& WHO is saying smarts are SUPERIOR to muscle?
is paying for gifts like floodng 1 organ with blood, starvng others? = death2all?

Answer 1

is paying for gifts like floodng 1 organ with blood, starvng others? = death2all?

No.

Answer 2

Wisdom from God's Word!

Ecclesiastes 9:11
I have seen something else under the sun: The race is not to the swift or the battle to the strong, nor does food come to the wise or wealth to the brilliant or favor to the learned; but time and chance happen to them all.