There is too much money to be made by having 50 bowl games. Everyone has some stupid sponsers name, Tostitos Fiesta Bowl, Nokia Suger Bowl, ect. They will never change it because in collage football, all they care about is money. Go figure. Playoffs would not only be good for some of the teams with 1 or 2 loses, but for the sport. I only care for my team and the National Championship. If a playoff system was added, everygame would be as important as the other. Why would a team really care about winning the Insight or Alamo Bowl , what have they really won. The school makes out because they get the check. Players get NOTHING. I wish fans would refuse to watch ALL bowl games for a couple years and demand a playoff system. See how fast they system changes. That is a pure fantasy because there is no way that ever happen. Collage football is great during the regular season, but the bowl game deal needs to change.
2006-10-25 12:04:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, till a playoff approach is situated, the BCS is ordinarily the nice approach to be had. I recognize humans like to opt for on it, and factor out groups that had been screwed over via it, however what different approach is there? Letting the sportswriters, or the coaches come to a decision. I consider if you can determine, in each and every season that the bcs has been worried, the equal 2 groups that had been quantity a million and three in each the AP ballot , and the USA in these days coaches ballot , had been the groups that performed within the NC sport. I absolutely suppose there demands to be a playoff approach, however it is going to no longer occur till meetings just like the SEC and the Big 12 unite with the smaller meetings and drive the Pac 10 and Big 10 to move with it. Right now, the ones 2 meetings and their Rose bowl manage ABC are the fundamental causes there may not be a playoff approach. Personally, I suppose a sixteen workforce playoff approach might be first-class, That might enable for the champions from all 12 NCAA Bowl subdivision meetings to have one access each and every, plus four at significant bids, that might be decided on from any convention, or unbiased workforce(Notre dame obviously) It might take 15 video games complete to come to a decision a National champion. You might even use the bowl approach alongside the best way. And the country wide Championship groups might need to play five further video games, and in step with such a lot school magnificence schedules, or four of the ones video games might be performed for the period of the christmas holiday, so the pupil atheletes would not leave out categories. Another choice might be to have a 12 workforce playoff, wherein the six BCS meetings have automated bids for his or her champs, and six at significant bid will take delivery of out. This might additionally maintain any deserving groups from smaller meetings from being within the playoffs. After all, who rather desires to look at an unranked Tulsa, who gained convention USA with and eleven-three list, play towards Florida or Texas, or USC? Teams like Utah, and Boise state might make the playoffs, however might need to play multiple sport to end up they deserve a country wide identify shot.
2016-09-01 02:38:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately the people behind the BCS will never agree because then they will be out of the job. Last I heard, playoffs would "interfere" with finals but that is just absolutely crap. Look at March Madness. I've been calling for playoffs since 2000. It seems like every year, the BCS screws over a very worthy team of going to the national championship in order to give the invite to a lower team who will (obviously) lose.
2006-10-25 11:26:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by nighthawk_842003 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree!! AND to the person who said just OSU fans would go for this, I am an Ohio State fan and i hate the BCS and most people I know do too. Ohio State deserves the number 1 spot fair and square right now. On another note, I go to Auburn University so having OSU play Auburn would KILL me as i love both my teams.
2006-10-25 11:55:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by jlandrews3 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because of the economics behind major college football, which I don't understand because I don't follow football because of economics, there will never be a playoff system and the BCS, which of course is flawed, is the best system we'll ever get.
The good thing about the BCS is that it involves BOTH two human (highly subjective) polls in the Harris and ESPN, while also using six computer (highly objective) polls. My opinion as a college football fan since 1971
2006-10-26 05:23:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not a huge BCS fan, but I fail to see your point. Most, if not all, bowl game matchups are inter-conference games, so your argument of wanting to see "teams from completely different conferences play each other" is not a good one.
The process of elimination aspect would be great, but we could have no more than 8 teams in a playoff situation due to scheduling issues.
2006-10-25 11:19:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question is who DOESN'T think the BCS is crap. Well other then 1&2 in the last BCS standings. They only will say it is great because they don't have to earn the Championship game through the playoffs.
2006-10-25 11:55:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
College football is about the pageantry, tradition, spirit, and sportsmanship. Bowl games provide all of these. I think a playoff system would change college football in a bad way. The point of college sports is not to have a definitive national champion, it is for all the reasons above. If you want to watch football where winning and being #1 is the main priority, watch the NFL.
2006-10-25 11:23:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Take it from Toby 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
the bcs is crap get rid of the damn thing and go to a playoffs like the nfl only with more teams of course and play the damn thing out and see how it goes then and only then can people stop whining about who should be in the damn championship game
2006-10-26 07:34:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's a MOUNTAINOUS PILE OF CRAP for the most part. The only thing it would be useful for year in and year out would be ranking teams for a playoff based on won-lost record against perceived strength of schedule.
2006-10-26 06:09:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by bigvol662004 6
·
0⤊
0⤋