What's your opinion? Are the critics in any way to blame for the situation in Iraq?
2006-10-25 10:53:59 · 17 answers · asked by jack b 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The critics would not have been criticizing if the situation was not worthy of criticism. Yes, the media over analyzes to fill up the long news hours. However, Cheney and the others knew the existence of such media before the Iraq mess. Helping the enemy? No. Setting up Americans as foolish among other nations? Yes.
2006-10-25 10:56:25 · answer #1 · answered by Teacher 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
For the oil offers and to ruin the Zionists enemies. The Project for the New American Century was once written by way of Zionists and adopted to the letter. As for tidals...-Iran allowed the Coalition to make use of Iranian airspace to bomb Iraq ,the IAEA unearths no cause to halt the peaceable nuclear vigour application of the Iranians, Iran hasnt attacked one other country in 2 hundred years, Israel has 70 nukes so despite the fact that Iran had one, they would now not use it with out MAD, the quandary might be an palms race with Saudi Arabia and all of the different countries within the neighborhood. Peace
2016-09-01 02:38:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a difference between being critical of the war and stating that our troops are committing war crimes. I think a lot of the things that have been said by certain Americans are helping the enemy.
2006-10-25 10:57:52 · answer #3 · answered by Automation Wizard 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Of course Cheney loves this war. Look at all the money his company, Halliburton, is making! No, bush, cheney & rumsfeld are to blame for the situation in Iraq. They ignored all the lessons learned in Vietnam.
2006-10-25 11:03:13 · answer #4 · answered by eilishaa 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
YES. If you read General Giap's biography he clearly stated that the American antiwar folks gave them the will to keep fighting. If not for Jane Fonda and John Kerry we could have had the war won in 1968 after TET. The same thing is happening in Iraq. The insurgents know that with the anti-American liberals they need only hold on til brainwashing is complete and the majority of Americans cry to end the fighting.
2006-10-25 11:00:16 · answer #5 · answered by Have gun, will travel. 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Of course he's right. The enemy sees us as a divided country because the losers on the left just can get over the fact that they can't win an election and they don't support our Country's efforts in the war on terror because of that. They give aid and comfort to the terrorists every time they come out with their devisive crapola. Just look at some of the letters from the loony lefties that will appear under your question and you'll see what I mean. Every time we make an advance, they get their panties in a wad and strat throwing invectives. They lie when it's easier to tell the truth and they give aid and comfort to the bad guys.
2006-10-25 11:04:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
maybe if clinton and his bunch of spinless cronies had done anything more than lob a missle at a mountain occasionally...we wouldnt be talking about this now....
if we had been more proactive years ago, instead of reactive, some of the issues that our soldiers are dieing for now would be moot.
the media is evil. everyone knows it. but yet we all listen to what they want the sheeple to hear. if we dont take care of this now....it will only grow bigger. i dont like that our sons being killed daily, but something and someone has to do this. the rest of the world stands by .....and watches...and cries about how we are so wrong.
i could go on and on
2006-10-25 11:12:27 · answer #7 · answered by pencilnbrush 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I find it baffling that anyone could even wonder about this. It's patently obvious that he is correct.
If it were not so, why would anyone attending a sporting event cheer one side and boo another?
There's no doubt that the critical coverage encourages the enemy. There's no doubt that the critical coverage can have no positive effect on our own soldiers, and could easily have a negative effect.
I find it unlikely that anyone would not know this to be true.
2006-10-25 11:00:05 · answer #8 · answered by open4one 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
That's absurd.
It is unconscionable for him to say that.
His office is probably the place where the fake and inconclusive evidence for wmds was fabricated in the first place.
For him to advocate for in illegal, unilateral invasion of Iraq, and and then blame the critics for helping the enemy is the height of arrogance and folly.
2006-10-25 11:00:02 · answer #9 · answered by a_blue_grey_mist 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
He is perfectly correct. The fact that Dems keep saying they will pull out ASAP sends a clear message to the terrorists- murder a few thousand more civilians, and the US will quit and run away with its tail between the legs- as they did in Vietnam, Somalia, Iran.
IMO the "critics" verge on treason. And in quite a few cases walk well over the line
2006-10-25 10:58:15 · answer #10 · answered by cp_scipiom 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋