I'm in Ohio and during our next Elections in November, a law may be passed to ban smoking in public. How is that even constitutional? So, let me get this straight, owmen can abort their own babies, homosexuals can't marry, and we will no longer have the right to smoke outside our homes. Oh, and I can't forget that in another state they are trying to ban baggy jeans. What next, are they going to ban cable television? What about football because it's an agressive sport? what are your opinions?
2006-10-25 10:51:46 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I think it should be up to the owner of the restaraunt if smoking should be allowed or not.
2006-10-25 10:56:19 · update #1
I do agree with you as I am non smoker it should be up to the individula establishment to make such bands and it is my right to choose if I want to eat, work or spend my money there. (also as I am gay! YES REPUBLICANS I AM GAY AND I VOTE DEMOCRAT,
2006-10-25 10:58:02 · answer #1 · answered by southernboy 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Anything is possible these days that's why as a woman I vote because we fought long and hard for that right and I feel if enough of us don't do it the government will take that right from us, why wouldn't they,they do with everything else, same went for my foid card I applied for it and baught a fire arm before they take that right away too, I think as Americans we need to exercise more of our free rights before they're all taken from us next thing you'll know we'll have to pay a tax everytime we wipe our @ss.
2006-10-25 10:56:27 · answer #2 · answered by MOVING 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
State of Maine - The Director of Animal Welfare based on overspending her 2008 funds by way of $six hundred,000 is attempting to bypass a bill that tosses out citizens' perfect to due technique. Upon suspicion of animal forget or abuse an Animal administration Officer or Animal Welfare Investigator is authorized to pass into your place and grab any and all your animals with no warrant. so a techniques as staring on the form and asserting "we're not allowed to do this anymore" you will no longer discover rights taken away. think of smaller. think of a few individual who has somebody wreck into their homestead and if the burglar gets harm is in charge for damages. think of roughly an worker being fired for no longer adhering to a organisation's coverage on the same time as an worker of minority shows the comparable habit and keeps to be. the completed stimulus bill became taxation without illustration. no one asked me what i presumed, I informed my senators no way, and our infants would be those paying all that money returned.
2016-12-08 21:15:23 · answer #3 · answered by ricaurte 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not constitutional, our courts have been used for years to circumvent our Representative government and establish unconstitutional laws. Vote for Republicans who will keep electing originalists to the courts who strictly interpret the constitution and do not look at it as a work in progress. It is a perfect document and does not need to be compared to international consensus or used for liberal activists.
2006-10-25 11:02:14 · answer #4 · answered by razeumright 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes...its really gotten out of hand.
In regards to smoking, that is a personal choice.
Now, I am happy that restaurants are smoke-free...but to ban smokers from smoking outside in public places is just wrong.
All personal and consensual issues done by adults and/or with adults should be off-limits to government regulation.
2006-10-25 10:56:01 · answer #5 · answered by docscholl 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's tough because smoking in public does impact those that may not want to be exposed. Thats why they can elect to ban smoking in public. People should be free to do what they want as long as it doesn't harm another living person.
2006-10-25 11:14:29 · answer #6 · answered by Existence 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
hmmm... look at the law. that passed in california, but if the workers were all part owners and all agreed then you could smoke in the place. also one place wears gas masks and you can smoke. check the stipulations, i'm sure there are some.
2006-10-25 11:01:46 · answer #7 · answered by Jenessa 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think It's ridiculous...
You are right...Why can't we make our own decisions...
I think It's starts in school first, every one has to be the same...
Taught the same, dress the same...ETC...
Now the people that believed it in school are all grown up and "know" they know better. Brain washed)
We don't have our rights anymore...and we will get less...
No matter who's in the white house...
They will vote on bills that will make sure children are taught what they want them to know.
We are now letting our own government brain wash our children's minds so it will get easyer for them...the government...
And we stand by and watch....when will It end...
2006-10-25 11:10:28 · answer #8 · answered by shoot.bang 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you better be at the voting booth to vote YES ON 4 to keep smoking in public..
if its is even a tie then 4 still passes..
im from ohio and i will vote yes on 4
2006-10-25 11:05:46 · answer #9 · answered by bllnickie 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
My opinion is that they should ban war. Then we can pick on the smaller things our government has and will ban.
2006-10-25 11:21:13 · answer #10 · answered by beez 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋