Why can't people grow babies in nutrient tubes so the mother won't go through pain?

Question

Or just use a real uterus someone donated in surgery, most likely after death, (in a car accident or something like that so it's healthy to have it).

Answer 1

good idea, why not start with yours.

Answer 2

Doing this would take on a kind of "The Matrix" feel to life. You are essentially taking the humanness out of the whole process of life. One of the reasons mothers care so much is hormones that are produced. Even in adoption, the adoptive mother almost always produces "mother hormones" extremely soon after the arrival of the baby, and sometimes even beforehand. But doing this "nutrient tube" deal would change the nature of the baby from small human into some kind of impersonal clone. And if you do it with every baby, soon the mother instinct (and father instinct for that matter) could very soon be obliterated from our genetic makeup, and the family as it is currently would no longer really exist anywhere.

Answer 3

It truly easily relies upon. If the egg maintains to go down the tube then definite. If no longer, there's a solid threat that the guy will could desire to have surgical operation to get rid of it and the turning out to be fetus would be terminated. specifically circumstances the egg starts off to enhance on the very end of the tube and could be stored, yet while that's no longer the case then there is not any longer something which could be performed. yet no person truly is acquainted with. in basic terms time will tell. It relies upon on her physique and the toddler.

Answer 4

For the pain of actual birth there is something called an epidural. It makes the mother unable to feel pain below the waist, will still allowing her to push the baby out. Otherwise ther is a C-section, which is a minor surgery, but I know women who recommend it highly. If you don't want anything else associated with birth then adopt (your suggested "real uterus" and no one has to die).

Answer 5

Why can't people teleport across the universe? Because it isn't possible... yet, anyway. But on the non-scientific side of the question, many women say the positives outweigh the negatives. Maybe I'm just wierd, but as a guy, I feel that I am missing out because I cannot experience the beauty of childbirth from the woman's perspective.

Would anyone like to mention the eerie science-fiction aspect?

Answer 6

Let's put it this way - do you want your first child to be conceived, nurtured, grown, and born using techniques and organs that have been used and perfected over millions of years of evolution, or from a nutrient tube that has never been used before for a human baby?

If this device was actually built, someone would have to try it first, risking an actual human fetus. Will you volunteer to do this with your kid?

Answer 7

Most birth mothers would agree that the pain was worth it and is a minor consideration.
Right now, artificial baby growth of babies costs tons more than the biological methods. It's the market place!

Answer 8

I'm not a "father", don't have any kids, never been married, anyways, as of your question: If you seriously wanna be the "real mother" of your child, you'll deal with the pain. Otherwise "adopt" a child, but that's my opinion.-(no offense in any way.) good luck!

Answer 9

The babies and mothers would miss the months of care and bonding that occur when women are pregnant.

Answer 10

i'm pretty sure that that kind of technolngy doesn't exist yet.
also, most mothers want it to be their kid.