Yes, but it will be triggered by something else. Extreme resource shortage, nuclear attack, or natural disaster maybe. Then everyone will go crazy and we'll see who really has the power here.
2006-10-25 09:48:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'm not likely to write down an essay, yet i'd imagine the conservatives might want to nicely win because defense force hierarchy has a tendency to be conservative and conservative civilians, i imagine, have a tendency to be more effective perfect armed than liberals, although neither part is more effective dedicated to their reason. If the president were more effective liberal than conservative, i ask your self how the generals and admirals would follow the orders of their commander in chief. overseas powers would revel contained in the 2d American Civil warfare and may want to nicely make a contribution to both part so we would ruin ourselves, and no IEDs will be needed nor would suicide attacks in any respect. i don't think of both part would have an area in terrain because the warfare will be fought over the entire u . s . a . in all kinds of terrain. i'm no youthful guy, yet i'm hoping my new granddaughter lives to be a humorous old woman and not in any respect unearths out contained in the authentic international the answer on your question. obviously, neither part would win. One part would in basic terms lose decrease than the different.
2016-12-05 05:41:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by doucet 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope. I'm not interested in what those rich people got. I'd like health insurance. I don't need a second house, vacations at the drop of a hat, or living on the coast. Give me health insurance and a fair retirement income and I'll stay out of it.
2006-10-25 09:46:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by loryntoo 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, but the rich republicans have the money to do a smear campaign even before the battle starts, then, they will have more money to buy better guns...what kind of a battle will that be?
2006-10-25 09:39:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by fairly smart 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your assumption is that there are many "have nots" and "few haves." This is not true.
There is a large middle class and American standard of living is consistently rising.
You don't know what you are talking about.
2006-10-25 09:44:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by C = JD 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
i thought i smelled alcahol....working poor...lol...i have a house two cars and a huge star trek collection but friend...im FAR...from rich. Im living proof of the middle class and as long as you and your liberal friends are voted out when you propose the tax increases and transfer payments...ill still be here.
2006-10-25 09:47:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is not a matter of "guts." Americans are generally satisfied with life...few, if any are starving or homeless and as a result most of the "commercial" envy is simply a "have" wanting more.
2006-10-25 09:40:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by kingstubborn 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Junior you sure don't know much about America do you.
In this country anyone can get ahead if they try.
why do you think everyone want sot come her form every country in the world. why dop think people are not breaking into Russia, Iran, Iraq, Egypt?
2006-10-25 09:42:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I see you haven't taken Poli-Sci 101. The Power Elite of the US is especially interresting in that if one does not vote, they do not have Power. Those who do, are the ruling class. End of story. Thank you, and gimme my 10 points, please.
2006-10-25 09:43:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by sjsosullivan 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Did you have too much alcohol before posing this question. Get a life.
2006-10-25 09:44:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋