English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think Gangs are good, but Gang Violence is wrong, so We have to create more recreational and Cultural activities for Youths!

2006-10-25 09:26:23 · 8 answers · asked by Aladino Z 2 in Social Science Sociology

Gang is a formal or informal group consisting of three or more people that is involved in the commission of criminal acts(as one of its activities), or has two or more members who engage in common activities. The Republican Gang, the Punks, the Hells Angels, the Hippies, the Lwayers. the Protestants, the ......U name it.
We all are in gangs, one way or the other, cos we are social beings.
Gangs shoudn't be criminalized!

2006-10-25 09:40:33 · update #1

8 answers

Humans are dangerous

2006-10-25 09:47:43 · answer #1 · answered by The Gadfly 5 · 0 0

Actually, none of those animals travel in gangs.
Wolves travel in packs, lions in prides, buffalo in herds, apes in families or tribes, and bears... don't. I don't know where you got the bears from.
And in any case, these animals travel in "gangs" because that is their entire community. Humans have the opportunity to stay in one area, one community. So the need for gangs is little or none. The need for gang violence is even less. It's just stupidity mounting stupidity.

2006-10-25 09:37:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Humans have a society to live in where peace should be enforced. We aren't animals eating one another. Gangs are not good. They promote violence and hatred. Animals gather in packs to protect their FAMILIES. That is what humans should do.

2006-10-25 09:36:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because we have a forebrain which tells us the difference between good and bad. Animals don't have that, they don't know the diff between good or bad. So they roam and attack in packs. Only mentally challenged humans do that. Or sad gang bangers.

2006-10-25 09:53:06 · answer #4 · answered by johnno K 4 · 0 0

All i comprehend is that, by technique of the solutions I see revealed by technique of the guy in question, i'd say that i do not quite imagine the point is to get suitable answer or TC status. i believe that the entire aspect in answering any question, by technique of any skill, is only a cleansing soap-container for him to spout notwithstanding "message" is his aspect of the day. all the solutions I have ever considered at the instantaneous are not open to communicate or rebuttal because he, in his own ideas, is continually correct and is the in basic terms one with the "actuality" which might want to be "shared" even if you're listening. Methinks it really is someone in love with the sound of his own voice yet, the following, it would want to be written. inspite of this I in basic terms pass him by technique of, as i'd any lengthy-winded bore at a celebration. i do not problem to gang up on him. he's not of any problem to me, and that i do not desire any damage to him in any respect. It retains him busy! *smile* Peace all.

2016-12-05 05:40:51 · answer #5 · answered by doucet 4 · 0 0

Most animals live in herdes
People live in families

2006-10-25 10:57:43 · answer #6 · answered by spyblitz 7 · 0 0

Maybe that would make us to be more like animals. Lol

2006-10-25 09:34:00 · answer #7 · answered by DAMOLA A 2 · 0 0

So what is your question?

2006-10-25 09:33:43 · answer #8 · answered by mei-lin 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers