English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-25 09:12:52 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

9 answers

yes and no

Hegel pointed out-in philosophy as well as scientific thought-that what our limited human knowledge presumes is often inaccurate and/or incomplete.

It is possible that what we perceive as
A---> B is really, in fact
A--->n1--->n2--->n3--->n times---> B
that is, there might be an indeterminable number of steps that are beyond our understanding/instrumentality/conception/theory

so....cause and effect might be a relatively simplistic explanation for what is really a much more complex relationship

2006-10-25 11:11:20 · answer #1 · answered by Gemelli2 5 · 1 0

Causality is a fundamental part of science, best described by Newtonian physics. But the language of science is mathematics, which is not bound by cause and effect relationships. More abstract questions can be posed mathematically, leading to conclusions which are "provable" through the rules of mathematics even though they make not be expressible in the physics of cause and effect.

2006-10-25 09:43:20 · answer #2 · answered by PAUL K 1 · 1 1

I could love to reply at the behalf of Intelek. Virtual debris, that's, debris that experience popped into lifestyles out of the vacuum, would possibly turn out to be truly whilst they have interaction with truly debris earlier than they have got a threat to come out of lifestyles once more. Also, whilst a digital particle pair is created close the occasion horizon of a black gap, one member of the pair could also be look simply within the horizon and be pulled again into the singularity at the same time the opposite would possibly look simply external the horizon and get away from the black gap altogether. The escaped digital particle then turns into truly. I desire to stress that the illusion of digital debris has no purpose (except you don't forget information a purpose). They look at random. To say that the giant bang has a purpose assumes the passage of time throughout which the purpose need to have existed, however that will not be a reasonable assumption. It could also be that the giant bang created time itself as good as house, power, and topic, wherein case there might were no time and for that reason no purpose earlier than the giant bang. Many of the commonsensical laws of daily existence do not follow to the universe as a complete.

2016-09-01 02:34:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

ONLY in science there's cause and effect, because both are scientific categories.

2006-10-25 09:23:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Causality is a fundamental assumption of the scientific method, as is global phenomena.

A non-causality, or a local phenomena, are outside the realm of science.

2006-10-25 09:20:41 · answer #5 · answered by Curly 6 · 0 0

Theoretically

2006-10-25 09:27:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

For every action there is an opposite and equal reaction.

2006-10-25 14:44:02 · answer #7 · answered by tim b 4 · 0 0

Yes, which means there was a first cause. Thus God.

2006-10-25 11:50:35 · answer #8 · answered by MLK II 2 · 0 1

Yes, for sure

2006-10-25 09:23:52 · answer #9 · answered by latif_1950 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers